Posted on 12/13/2011 11:43:12 PM PST by yank in the UK
"In an effort to cut off funds to Somali terrorists, banks in Minnesota will no longer support money transfers via local businesses called 'hawalas.' But the Useful Idiot Franken, with a typical Leftist inversion of reality, says that if they do this, the terrorists win:
The terrorists do win.
They can no longer buy their bullets and they get their 72 virgins and nobody is happier for them than I.
“Without hawalas Somalis worry that their families in their home country will have no way of supporting themselves.”
Well then, out of compassion we’ll just have to get those families reunited in the good old U S of A.
Al Franken, the guy who won the Senate election with votes that were “suddenly found”.
Al Franken, the guy who won the Senate election with votes that were “suddenly found”.
Change your diaper Al..
I bet Al Franken is a funny looking fcuker when he is enraged
Get Al Franken actually pontificating the position that you allege he making onto some media video site; quit editorializing. It’ll go viral if its actually true.
If that’s AlHat’s opinion, send his ass to whatever freaking country he thinks is so much better.
We will make sure he doesn’t miss the flight (I’m virtual certain that between ALL of us we can come up with whatever cost it takes to move that ugly son-of-a-bitch, entire family, entourage and hangers on to whatever country they deem to be so much better than this sad sack hole in the ground to live in).
I’ll give 10 bucks, if that helps.
10 Canadian dollars, which is worth 10.10 US dollars, so don’t tell me I’m not doing my part to help clean up America.
I'm a comedian ~ Al Franken
Jack Benny was a comedian! Al Franken is a joke!
I’m assuming that Al knows he’s Jewish, of course, and I’m assuming he knows these Somalis are Muslims, right? And I’m assuming, maybe too much perhaps, but I’m assuming Al knows that if they could they’d kill him?
I didn’t see in the article that Franken was “enraged”. Y’all should not be making up these allegations.
Unless you know something that wasn’t mentioned in this article that the thread links to, disregard this.
You obviously didn’t read BOTH sources
Okay, I’ll bite: Where is the other source? I saw a link in the article and perused that as well, and saw no “enraged” comments regarding Franken.
Not that I’m defending him, mind you.
Okay, WHERE in that article does it say that Franken is “enraged” ? It merely shows a statement, and the fact that he sent a letter regarding this issue.
Is that enough to be considered “enraged?” Are we reading between the lines?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.