Posted on 12/13/2011 8:51:04 PM PST by Mozilla
Edited on 12/13/2011 8:55:53 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
WASHINGTON (AP)
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
Christine O’Donnell, infuriating RINO’s as effectively as anyone else in America.
<><><><
So she’s infuriating RINOs by supporting one? Or Romney is not, in your view, a RINO?
I’m confused by your logic.
I admit, her endorsement confuses me.
I’m supporting her on principle. She’s earned that.
There are two things that are now crystal clear. The GOP is hell bent on having Romney as the nominee. Why? I have no clue. The other thing that is clear is that Axelrod and company intend to win this election one way or the other. They have had 3 years to set up the theft of the election.
I rarely watch Fox anymore but last night Ann Coulter was on Hannity and she said the 2 most conservative candidates are Bachman and are you ready for this.... ROMNEY. My jaw dropped to the floor when I heard her say that. It was a serious wtf moment. So Romney is now more conservative (according to Ann )than Santorum? Has she lost her mind? He is hands down the least conservative candidate other than Hunstman who is just a progressive calling himself a Republican.
I will not vote for Romney, Huntsman or Paul in the primary. IF any of them did win the nomination I will vote but I won’t like it. I will vote because anyone is better than Barry the Kenyan Marxist Soetoro and God help us if he gets 4 more years and more Supreme court nominations. That would be the end if he was able to stack the court with pinkos and progressives. We already have 2 lesbo progressives, imagine as a lame duck who he would pick.
He may have driven Palin from the race.
______________________
He absolutely did. Rove is a Bush man and he wants Barry Hussein to win again so he can pave the way for Jeb in 2016.
I do not think Romney will win the nomination, but if he did, you do realize who gets to choose the Supreme Court justices, right? You do realize how long new, young pinkos would sit, right? Do you think the USA would be recognizable in 10 years? I don’t. I still believe if you have only 2 choices, you choose the lesser of the 2 evils and not voting is a vote for obongo.
Yea, bravo! 4 more years with Marxist Kenyan Barry Hussein. That thrills me all to hell and it even thrills me more that he might get to pick some more for the Supreme Court. If that happens, you will rue the day you didn’t vote.
I paid her a lot more than 2.00, I want my money back. She’s just an opportunistic fraud.
Send the bill to Karl Rove.
Lay off the O’Donnell bashing.
You’re an idiot.
Agree.
Got anything positive to say about (anyone)?
Or do you simply insult?
Rove didn’t make her support Mittens, she’s a sell out. and don’t you tell me to lay off the O’Donnell bashing.... You don’t tell me what to do do. kma&stfu.
Agree
Whatever.
I speak positively of those who are conservative, and bash those who need it.
LOL. You are just making up your own version of history. Karl Rove most definitely did not cost us the Senate.
First, we only have 47 Republican Senators, so the Delaware seat would not have put us over the top anyway. Second, that flake Christine O'Donnell lost the second she was nominated. She was a clown candidate who had zero chance of winning a statewide election in Delaware even in a massive Republican wave year. She was a goofball and even if Rove had actually gone out and campaigned for her she would have lost badly. Seriously, the woman lost by like 17 points, Rove and every other political analyst (both right and left) who said she was a disaster of a candidate were entirely correct. Third, whatever his flaws, Rove's Crossroads PAC poured more money in to assist the other weak Tea Party Senate candidates than anyone else - that includes loads of money to help people like Angle and Buck. We did not win the Senate because some of the Tea Party senate candidates simply sucked. Angle was a terrible candidate, Buck was better but still not particular good - and even though we technically retain the seat, Miller ran an entirely incompetent campaign.
The lesson is, nominate the most conservative candidate who CAN win a general election, not just the most conservative candidate. Electability is a huge factor in choosing a nominee, and in 2010 we blew some big opportunities by nominating a few horribly flawed candidates. Hopefully we will not repeat the same mistakes in 2012.
wellllll.... I defended her in the past but this shows her as both flaky and not serious about Tea Party issues!!
That transparent Rovian “logic” is baloney.
Rove is on the wrong side of everything he’s ever done.
Rove is part of the problem.
And yes, Rove cost O’Donnell (and the GOP) that election.
I agree O’Donnell has backed the wrong horse. Romney and his John Edwards hair seems to have that effect on some GOP women.
Unless there’s things we don’t know about Rove, he’s got no excuse.
He’s just plain on the wrong side.
The field is narrowing. Maybe its already reaching the point of “least worst” rather than “best” choice
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.