Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cripplecreek

What is not Constitutional about a group of elected leaders following the will of their constituents and enacting a law against public smoking?

There was a time when one could smoke on a plane too...


13 posted on 12/13/2011 10:15:13 AM PST by TSgt (Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: TSgt
What is not Constitutional about a group of elected leaders following the will of their constituents and enacting a law against public smoking?

So I'm guessing you would be OK with a law dictating that certain ethnic groups couldn't own businesses or live in certain areas if that's what the constituents want?
17 posted on 12/13/2011 10:20:10 AM PST by cripplecreek (Stand with courage or shut up and do as you're told.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: TSgt
What is not Constitutional about a group of elected leaders following the will of their constituents and enacting a law against public smoking?

I can just see the "elected leaders" following the will of the OWS anarchists.

19 posted on 12/13/2011 10:23:05 AM PST by Osage Orange (HE HATE ME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson