” - - - almost every Newt-basher has no facts - - - “
Well, my FRiend, I’m impressed that you left yourself some wiggle room.
I am in your “almost” category.
Recent Nanny-State Newt verbal factoid: Nanny-Boy last week or so proposed his hair-brained Nanny idea that yours and my tax dollars be given to children to pay them for working after school.
The fact is that Newt said it.
The consequence is that Big Brother Newt will take care of all the children whose parents did not do the duties that Newt wanted them to do.
Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Ponder for a moment Chairman Obama, if he had not had The Great Recession to deal with.
Now ponder Nanny-State Newt as President when the US Economy takes off like a coiled spring.
In my humble, but ALWAYS correct opinion, Newt would outspend Obama by 10 % per year. Not a fact, just an opinion.
BTW, what Facts do you know of to demonstrate that Newt has EVER done anything to make the US Federal Govern significantly smaller?
BTW, BTW, until the above facts appear, I remain a devoted “Newt-basher.”
I hope there is enough disk space on JimRob’s servers to hold the list you are going to provide us with the names of U.S. Presidents and other politicians who actually reduced the size of the federal government.
And in typical Newt-basher fashion, you simply can't help posting lies fueled by your Newt-hatred. Newt did not suggest this program for children whose "parents did not do what Newt wanted themto do." He suggested it for poor children stuck in poverty for generations who never learn to develop a work ethic. Go spread your lies on some Facebook post or MSNBC chatroom where people are not sophisticated enough to tell the difference between what Next said, and what you twisted it into.