To: 2ndDivisionVet
What “crash”? Images from Iran showed an intact vehicle.
2 posted on
12/11/2011 12:05:41 AM PST by
Roccus
(POLITICIAN...............a four letter word spelled with ten letters.)
To: Roccus
They are trying to spin it. The web is faster than their spin.
5 posted on
12/11/2011 12:15:42 AM PST by
jonrick46
(2012 can't come soon enough.)
To: Roccus; 2ndDivisionVet
What crash? Images from Iran showed an intact vehicle.
Was that one the one that supposedly "flew" into Iran and was shot down on that mission? Is it possible that is another one someone conveniently had "flown" to Iran to expose our technology? Whole and undamaged?
So one is shot down < /not >, but did that even matter? Was the shoot down a cover story to cover up another perfect transfer of our U.A.V. technology (a whole undamaged U.A.V.?)
Maybe the whole thing was a plan from the beginning to get that technology into our enemies hands.
Didn't O just come back from a trip and talk with the Chinese? Was trade all he really talked about? The gang in D.C. is not to be trusted at all. Got to wonder who really made out on this deal.
So O got his campaign contributions from both China and Iran? Just in time to fund (along with the "stimulus kick backs") O's presidential election campaign for 2012!
$ux to be U.S. with O in office, huh?
8 posted on
12/11/2011 12:35:04 AM PST by
JSteff
((((It was ALL about SCOTUS. Most forget about that and HAVE DOOMED us for a generation or more.))))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson