“However....His is completely wrong about Obama’s eligibility. Deliberately so I believe. As a result, I don’t fully trust him.”
Just what did Mark Steyn say about Obama’s eligibility that upset you so?
I have heard him say that he doesn’t want Obama removed on a technicality. He wants him defeated because his policies are bad.
That would be a greater victory. If he is removed because of ineligibility, he becomes a martyr to the left. If he is voted out by the American people, it is a victory in the hearts and minds of the American people. They have seen the light, and have rejected the fascist/socialist policies of the left.
Mark Steyn is right.
Just ask the families who are mourning soldier brought home in caskets due to Obama’s insane rules of engagement. Ask them how they feel about a “technicality” in the Constitution.
One hundred percent loyalty to America, Americans, and our soldiers is what is essential in a Commander in Chief. Then we should ask if his foreign policies are supporting and upholding foreign political factions that are dedicated to killing our soldiers and Americans.
Geeze! Some technicality! ( eye roll). Steyn is wrong and, personally, I believe he knows it. For this reason he is not completely trustworthy. !
When did the Constitution become a “technicality”?
Steyn knows that Article 2, Section 1, is not a technicality. It **is** the Constitution! He knows this, too, and is deliberately misleading his listeners.
While he does good work, I will never again fully trust him.