Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: momtothree
I think secretly that many so called freepers would support this type of activity today simply as a way of limiting undesirables

My sentiments as well...

In times past society practiced a form of "eugenics" in the fact those persons called "father" (I know archaic nowadays) would not allow their daughters or sons to marry potential "undesirables" and procreate a line of dysfunctional offspring or misfits ...I know I've tossed a few out the front door myself...

Also the lack of a massive welfare state in times past lent itself to some self control except for the really ignorant or stupid...

Giving ANY level of government ANY control over our ability to procreate is evil ...

27 posted on 12/10/2011 7:02:37 AM PST by Popman (Obama is God's curse upon the land....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: Popman
"...I know I've tossed a few out the front door myself..."

I've met several at the door while wearing a well-filled shoulder holster -- and no jacket.

For undesirable suitors, that was usually the last visit. The "winners" greeted me with. "Hey, is that a H-K?" '-)

46 posted on 12/10/2011 8:51:25 AM PST by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Popman

There are a multitude of REAL Issues/Problems related to this subject, some of which are:

(1) irresponsible behavior by certain people leading to unplanned/unwanted/unsupportable pregnancies tends to be passed on to their offspring, thereby creating even more unplanned/unwanted/unsupportable pregnancies

(2) not having an inverse relationship between number of unplanned/unwanted/unsupportable pregnancies and public provided financial support nor any sort of serious prevention procedures has created a whole sub-culture of baby factories for $$$ (”welfare”) which is promoted by those well meaning but mentally deficient liberals who have legislated increasing benefits vs number of unplanned/unwanted/unsupportable pregnancies (ie “reach the threshold of 3 kids and we’ll upgrade your housing allowance from a two bedroom apartment to a three bedroom house”).

(3) I fail to understand how reproducing is a fundamental human right, if it is going to infringe seriously on others. If a person has no obvious ability, (mentally, morally or financially), to successfully create a productive, contributing member of our society, who will NOT need assistance from the rest of us for their entire life, then why should we NOT have the ability to withhold that activity for the sake of us all?

There was a time when frivolous procreation was frowned upon and even discouraged. The great Liberal movement of the 20th century eliminated those restrictions and now we live in a society that freely kills millions of human beings annually.

Isn’t it a FAR better thing to PREVENT unplanned/unwanted/unsupportable pregnancies than it is to kill millions of unplanned/unwanted/unsupportable HUMAN BEINGS?


48 posted on 12/10/2011 10:36:17 AM PST by CanuckYank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson