[JustCallMeFrank]

What is “socialist” about the screed? It states what the protestors claim are their objectives. The article doesn’t take a position on their objectives.

Is reading comprehension that hard?

I agree that OWS are a bunch of idealistic simpletons, but the purpose of this article was to explain to children what these people are doing and why. Just a simple, factual article.

[newzjunkey]

Did you read the piece run about the Tea Party last year, included in the article? It's partisan propaganda pushing Daniel Inouye, Barbara Boxer, Bill Clinton, Harry Reid.

Not a single Republican is quoted.

OWS is described as "worldwide" and about jobless and fairness and equity. Tea Party is described as "extreme" and "angry."

Do you NOT see the difference?

[ctdonath2]

[The screed] states what the protestors claim are their objectives.

The Occupiers have no objectives.

Kinda like the Tea Party, where if someone claims they're a leader, they're not. Small groups therein may have a leader, but the movement does not.

Likewise, anyone claiming to have a list of Occupy objectives doesn't. Small groups therein may have objectives, but the movement does not.