Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Too windy for wind turbines! 165mph gales raise MORE questions about wind farms
Daily Mail ^ | 9th December 2011 | Luke Salkeld

Posted on 12/08/2011 10:36:53 PM PST by george76

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: george76

Didn’t any of these people have a window fan in there home. They would know how the fan (window turbine) pulled air in and kept everything cool in the summer. Well they’re pulling all that Arctic air down on themselves with these huge fans....../s


21 posted on 12/09/2011 2:53:41 AM PST by Recon Dad (Autodidact in Gas & Petroleum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: george76; Horusra; Darnright; rdl6989; bamahead; Nervous Tick; SteamShovel; Tunehead54; golux; ...
Thanx for the ping george76 !

 


Beam me to Planet Gore !

22 posted on 12/09/2011 3:22:50 AM PST by steelyourfaith (If it's "green" ... it's crap !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll
I suppose the towers could be built to withstnad 200 mph winds...

I think the blades will bring the towers down once they catch the wind just right.

BTW, this in NOT the same one in the photo above.


23 posted on 12/09/2011 3:24:06 AM PST by raybbr (People who still support Obama are either a Marxist or a moron.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Liberty Valance

California Golden Eagles are claiming responsibility and threaten further acts of revenge ...


24 posted on 12/09/2011 3:31:43 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA; Liberty Valance

>>There’s something creepy looking about them.

On that note, don’t miss this comic take on that theme:

“Alternative Energy Revolution”
http://forums.xkcd.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=36348


25 posted on 12/09/2011 3:31:56 AM PST by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: george76

I always thought those turbines were suppose to have a governor or a “clutch” that would disengage or prevent the thing from winding out over a certain rpm.


26 posted on 12/09/2011 3:46:18 AM PST by MachIV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

As speeds increase, so do the effects of balance. The other issue is the design of the bearings to withstand those speeds in conjunction with the rotational imbalances. Everything magnified then and most likely would fall apart from the vibrational effects, not to mention any harmonics that would exponentially magnify all of the stresses.

Again, it costs more to attain, but if they are so hell bent on building more of these gawd awful things just simply add variable pitch blade mechanisms like aircraft use. Then they might be able to maximize the low airspeed conditions in addition to make them just sticks in the wind during high speeds by controlling the rotational speeds with pitch.


27 posted on 12/09/2011 4:52:11 AM PST by mazda77 (and I am a Native Texan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Liberty Valance

It looks like it’s not just on fire. It looks like the turbine is turning into plasma.


28 posted on 12/09/2011 4:53:11 AM PST by 6SJ7 (Meh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; All
Lots of good comments and photos at the original article.

(you are so subtle)

HEY ALL, if you read the comments at the ARTICLE LINK, you will find that that 165mph WIND figure was a ONE-OFF case , measured at the peak of some local mountain.

29 posted on 12/09/2011 8:36:22 AM PST by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
I think the blades will bring the towers down once they catch the wind just right.

NO ONE ELSE has noticed this yet, but if you look at the photo, the WIND TURBINE that is on FIRE is facing the opposite direction of the other two.


30 posted on 12/09/2011 8:42:26 AM PST by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
NO ONE ELSE has noticed this yet, but if you look at the photo, the WIND TURBINE that is on FIRE is facing the opposite direction of the other two.

I did notice that. It must have been spun around by the wind.

31 posted on 12/09/2011 2:00:25 PM PST by raybbr (People who still support Obama are either a Marxist or a moron.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
It's too bad that the 'experts' had to go with the old DUTCH WINDMILL style, because the one thing that these giant wind turbines cannot do is deal with HIGH SPEED SHIFTING winds. The 'mass' is to heavy to move quickly.

Now, had they gone with these, there would be no problems with the wind, or changing directions of the wind, and they could put a 100 of these in the same spot ONE of the large turbines takes up.


32 posted on 12/10/2011 3:07:09 PM PST by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
It must have been spun around by the wind.

You are correct. Want to see it spinning round and then catching fire?

Wind Turbine in Scotland catches fire.

(the good part is near the end of the video)

33 posted on 12/10/2011 6:13:18 PM PST by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson