Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Truth About the Valerie Plame Case Finally Emerges (Scooter Libby Innocent)
New American ^ | Sam Blumenfeld

Posted on 12/08/2011 4:39:47 PM PST by Mount Athos

Now that memoirs by the late Bob Novak, former Vice-President Dick Cheney, and former President George Bush have all been published, we now know much more about the Valerie Plame case than we did before these individuals put what happened to paper. (Plame, if you'll remember, was a CIA agent whose identity was leaked to the press during a newsman's investigation into George W. Bush's explanation for going to war against Iraq.) Yet, the one book that still needs to be written is a memoir by Lewis (Scooter) Libby, the VP’s assistant, the only individual indicted by the Special Prosecutor looking into the leak and found guilty in this highly controversial case.

Vice President Cheney had hoped that George Bush would issue a pardon of Libby, since he considered Libby to have been unjustly punished for something he did not do. But Bush decided not to pardon Libby, and this has left a deep sense of disappointment in Cheney’s otherwise good relations with the former President.

How did this whole controversy start? Bush writes in his memoir: “In my 2003 State of the Union address, I had cited a British intelligence report that Iraq sought to buy uranium [yellowcake] from Niger. That single sentence in my five-thousand-word speech was not a major point in the case against Saddam. The British stood by that intelligence.... In July 2003, former Ambassador Joseph Wilson wrote a New York Times column alleging that the administration had ignored his skeptical findings when he traveled to Africa to investigate the Iraq-Niger connection.”

Wilson’s column in the Times resulted in the President being called a liar, which caused people in the administration to wonder why Joseph Wilson, a Democrat critic of Bush, was sent to Niger by the CIA for this mission. Washington journalist Bob Novak wanted to write a column on the affair and managed to get an interview on July 8, 2003, with Deputy Secretary of State Richard L. Armitage.. He writes in his memoir, The Prince of Darkness:

Armitage was giving me high-level insider gossip, unusual in a first meeting. About halfway through our session, I brought up Bush’s sixteen words.... I then asked Armitage a question that had been puzzling me but, for the sake of my future peace of mind, would better have been left unasked. Why would the CIA send Joseph Wilson, not an expert in nuclear proliferation and with no intelligence experience, on the mission to Niger? “Well,” Armitage replied, “you know his wife works at the CIA, and she suggested that he be sent to Niger.” “His wife works at the CIA?” I asked. “Yeah, in counterproliferation.”

He mentioned her first name, Valerie.... The exchange about Wilson’s wife lasted no more than sixty seconds. Armitage offered no interpretation of Wilson’s conduct and said nothing negative about him or his wife. I am sure it was not a planned leak but came out as an offhand observation.... Shortly thereafter, he secretly revealed his role to federal authorities investigating the leak of Mrs. Wilson’s name but did not inform White House officials, apparently including the President.

Novak got Valerie’s last name from Wilson’s bio in Who’s Who. But after he used it in his column, the name Valerie Plame became big news in the media and caused quite a storm. On October 1, 2003, after reading a second column by Novak on the case, Armitage, alarmed by the clamor in the press for the name of the leaker who had outed a covert CIA agent, revealed his role to his boss Secretary of State Colin Powell. They took up the matter with State Department lawyer William H. Taft IV, who then spoke with White House counsel Alberto Gonzales, who allegedly told Taft that he did not want to know. But why didn't Taft or Powell go directly to the President with this important information?

In January 2004, the Justice Department chose prosecutor Patrick J. Fitzgerald to investigate the leak of Valerie Plame's identity. From the outset, he was made fully aware that the leaker was Armitage, who resigned from the State Department in November 2004 but remained a subject of the inquiry until February 2006 when Fitzgerald told him in a letter that he would not be charged. The New York Times reported on Sept. 2, 2006:

Mr. Armitage cooperated voluntarily in the case, never hired a lawyer and testified several times to the grand jury, according to people who are familiar with his role and actions in the case. He turned over his calendars, datebooks and even his wife's computer in the course of the inquiry, those associates said. But Mr. Armitage kept his actions secret, not even telling President Bush because the prosecutor asked him not to divulge it, the people said.

Why would the prosecutor keep this vital information from the President who had expressed concern over the outing of a CIA operative? Meanwhile, the liberal press hysterically speculated that it was Karl Rove and/or Vice President Cheney who most likely leaked Plame's identity to Novak. Dick Cheney writes in his memoir, In My Time:

Among the many things that should give a thinking person pause about this whole sad story is that Patrick Fitzgerald knew from the outset who had leaked the information about Wilson’s wife to Bob Novak. It had been Deputy Secretary of State Rich Armitage, who told the Justice Department that he had leaked the information to Novak, but kept what he had done from the White House. Armitage would later admit that he had even earlier told journalist Bob Woodward about Wilson’s wife’s employment. Indeed, on Bob Woodward’s tape of the June 13, 2003, conversation, Armitage can be heard leaking the fact that Wilson’s wife worked at the CIA four separate times.

So why did Patrick Fitzgerald spend more than two years conducting “a lengthy and wasteful investigation,” as the Washington Post called it? Members of the White House staff were interviewed by the FBI and dragged before a grand jury at great cost to them in attorney’s fees. Bob Novak wrote:

After Patrick Fitzgerald ... indicated to me he knew Armitage was my source, I cooperated fully with him. At the special prosecutor’s request and on my lawyers’ advice, I kept silent about this — a silence that subjected me to much abuse. I was urged by several friends, including some journalists, to give up my source’s name. But I felt bound by the journalist’s code to protect his identity.

Despite the fact that Fitzgerald knew the source of the leak, he decided to go after reporters who refused to name their sources. Thus, Times reporter Judith Miller spent 85 days in jail for refusing to reveal her sources to the prosecutor. She was finally released when she agreed to testify before a grand jury.

So, why did Fitzgerald go after Scooter Libby, Vice President Cheney's top aide? Apparently, Armitage had read a memorandum Libby had commissioned as part of an effort to rebut criticism of the White House by Joe Wilson. Who wrote the memorandum, and did it mention Valerie Plame? That information may have been revealed during Libby’s trial but has not been made public. Was it the source of any leaks to the press? Apparently not, for it was Armitage who supposedly read the report and made the leak, not Libby.

Nevertheless, it was Libby whom Fitzgerald decided to indict. The jury found Libby guilty, not of revealing Valerie Plame’s name to the press, but of perjury, obstruction of justice, and making false statements. What did he lie about? Libby said that he thought he had gotten the information about Valerie Plame from a conversation with Tim Russert, the news analyst. But Russert denied that he had given such information to Libby. As for obstruction of justice, what was Libby refusing to tell the prosecutor? Could it be that Libby was trying to protect his boss, the Vice President, who may have retrieved the information from his contacts at the CIA? And is that the reason why Cheney tried so hard to get Bush to pardon Libby?

Otherwise, there seems to be no reason why Libby would have lied about where he got the information about Plame, and no reason why he would have refused to answer questions that the prosecutor posed. Apparently, neither Cheney nor Libby knew that it was Armitage who had leaked Valerie Plame’s identity to Novak. Cheney himself had been interviewed twice by the Special Prosecutor in May and August 2004. Even the President himself was questioned by Fitzgerald.

In any case, since Libby was not the person who made Valerie Plame’s name public, he should not have been the subject of a prosecutor, whose aim seems have been to justify his more than two years of investigation in the nation’s capital, with all of its perks, good restaurants, and plush accommodations. Even a prosecutor from Illinois needed a respite from the local grind. So he got a conviction of sorts and was thus able to return to Chicago fully vindicated.

The Vice President knew that all of this could have been avoided had Secretary Colin Powell done his duty and told the President that he knew who had leaked Plame’s identity to Novak. But he preferred to remain silent, and thus opened the door to two years of a needless and wasteful investigation which distracted the administration, forced innocent staff members to undergo a costly inquisition, and led to the conviction of a loyal and highly competent public servant. Cheney made sure that the public would know the truth and took a parting shot at Colin Powell. He wrote:

For the latter part of 2003, all of 2004, and a good part of 2005, members of the White House staff produced box after box of documents, were interviewed by the FBI, hauled before a grand jury, and repeatedly questioned about these events.

Meanwhile, over at the State Department, Armitage sat silent. And, it pains me to note, so did his boss, Colin Powell, whom Armitage told he was Novak’s source on October 1, 2003. Less than a week later, on October 7, 2003, there was a cabinet meeting. At the end of it, the press came in for a photo opportunity, and there were questions about who had leaked the information that Wilson’s wife worked at the CIA. The President said he didn’t know, but wanted the truth. Thinking back, I realize that one of the few people in the world who could have told him the truth, Colin Powell, was sitting right next to him.

So, who was actually guilty of obstruction of justice? Was it Scooter Libby or Colin Powell? Or was it prosecutor Patrick J. Fitzgerald, who told Armitage to keep his mouth shut or face prosecution, [and] did not tell the President who the leaker was and spent the taxpayers' money in a costly prosecution against an innocent man.

Is it not a crime for a U.S. government official to deliberately withhold vital information from the President of the United States? Is it not a crime for a federal prosecutor to threaten a suspect with prosecution if he dared to tell the President that he was responsible for the leak? Had Powell told the President the truth, there would have been no need for a special prosecutor or grand inquisition.

When is the government going to indict Patrick J. Fitzgerald or Colin Powell for obstruction of justice? Of course, never. Meanwhile, Scooter Libby’s life has been ruined. But we await his own memoirs.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: armitage; plame; scooterlibby; valerieplame
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last
To: Mount Athos

21 posted on 12/08/2011 5:40:37 PM PST by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos

Its too bad all this was not about sex as it is now ok to lie about sex as long as one holds a high office


22 posted on 12/08/2011 5:40:46 PM PST by woofie (It takes three villages and a forest of woodland creatures to raise a child in Obamaville)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos

bttt


23 posted on 12/08/2011 5:46:51 PM PST by steelyourfaith (If it's "green" ... it's crap !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

Exactly. He’s a POS.


24 posted on 12/08/2011 5:55:06 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (Man is not free unless government is limited. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos

Thank you for posting this and I was surprised at some of the facts in the article. This is outrageous and I don’t see how Bush did not know this when he left office.

Why would Colin Powell do this? I don’t agree with him politically but always thought he was a man of integrity.

Why did President Bush not pardon Libby if he knew all of this? Very disappointing if these facts are correct and a stain on the President’s honor. Press be damned. They hated him anyways.


25 posted on 12/08/2011 5:59:16 PM PST by volunbeer (Keep the dope, we'll make the change in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UriÂ’el-2012

You are right, but no one cared to acknowledge this fact.


26 posted on 12/08/2011 6:01:15 PM PST by FamiliarFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: UriÂ’el-2012

The whole damned thing was a manufactured scandal by a Democratic operative. Wilson


27 posted on 12/08/2011 6:09:05 PM PST by listenhillary (Look your representatives in the eye and ask if they intend to pay off the debt. They will look away)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: FamiliarFace

I meant no one who mattered.


28 posted on 12/08/2011 6:10:13 PM PST by FamiliarFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: UriÂ’el-2012
Valerie Plame was NOT then and had not
been for over ten years a Covert CIA agent.
She worked at the Langley Headquarters of the CIA
and openly commuted to her office at Langley daily

Plame and Wilson were featured in Vanity Fare long before this and she was noted as working for the CIA...
29 posted on 12/08/2011 6:16:20 PM PST by Rumplemeyer (The GOP should stand its ground - and fix Bayonets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos

Ambition. Armitage, Powell and Fitzgerald all had or have ambition for power, perhaps presidential power in some fantasy future nurtured in their selfish little souls.

That’s why they did what they did.


30 posted on 12/08/2011 6:17:49 PM PST by Valpal1 (Worst tyranny is to force a man to pay for what he does not want because you think it good for him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel
Amen...
31 posted on 12/08/2011 6:55:36 PM PST by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos

Bush should have pardoned Libby- that much is certainly clear


32 posted on 12/08/2011 6:57:38 PM PST by Mr. K (Physically unable to profreed <--- oops, see?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

Agreed. I can’t believe I once supported that scum. Shame on me.


33 posted on 12/08/2011 7:00:07 PM PST by bobby.223
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: UriÂ’el-2012
I still believe the entire Plame Game was a cover up of Bill Clinton's Operation Merlin.

I believe the Clinton's were handing out nuclear secrets to anyone who wanted them and used the CIA as a cover claiming it was a CIA sting operation.

34 posted on 12/08/2011 7:00:34 PM PST by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: volunbeer
Why did President Bush not pardon Libby if he knew all of this?

If my memory serves me correctly, the fact that it was Armitage who leaked Plame's name to Novak came out only after President Bush left office. It came out when Novak was ill with what turned out to be terminal cancer. He was getting ready to publish his memoir and that's when Armitage admitted he was the leaker.

President Bush did commute Scooter's sentence, so he never had to spend a moment in jail. And there was a vigorous defense fund set up by Scooter's friends, so I'm sure his legal bills were taken care of. But GWB didn't fully pardon him because the President had promised publicly that whoever did leak the name would be held to account. GWB was as much a victim of Fitzgerald, Armitage, Powell and Novak as Scooter was. At the time he left office, all GWB knew was that Scooter was a convicted perjurer. GWB also did not have all the facts at his disposal, and the posted article makes that clear.

35 posted on 12/08/2011 7:02:13 PM PST by Wolfstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: bobby.223

I did too. Seemed like a level, sensible person. First there was Scooter Libby.

Then his support of Obama. It made me realize that to someone like him, race was far more important to him than national security or the well being of this country.

That particular thing was quite telling to me.


36 posted on 12/08/2011 7:08:11 PM PST by rlmorel ("A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject." Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar

Hogwash. President Bush knew it was an abuse of the judicial system and very reason the founders gave the power of pardon. My bet it was Karl Rove keeping the full pardon from happening - he was glad to see somebody else take the blame and wanted to keep Libby in focus. George Bush might have a better legacy had it not been for poll watching, let’s stay popular with the liberals Karl Rove.


37 posted on 12/08/2011 7:08:27 PM PST by RushingWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar
"...At the time he left office, all GWB knew was that Scooter was a convicted perjurer. GWB also did not have all the facts at his disposal, and the posted article makes that clear. ..."

That is the main reason I despise Colin Powell. He could have set that right. But didn't.

38 posted on 12/08/2011 7:10:39 PM PST by rlmorel ("A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject." Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos

More drag out the bash Bush crap.

Economy, Obamas’ extravagant spending, fake unemployment numbers, TRillions of dollars being spent,

Nah, why do that when Obama’s plan is to bash Bush while he’s campaigning, after all, it’s all he’s got...


39 posted on 12/08/2011 7:11:01 PM PST by Freddd (NoPA ngineers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos

More drag out the bash Bush crap.

Economy, Obamas’ extravagant spending, fake unemployment numbers, TRillions of dollars being spent, 4 wars

Nah, why do that when Obama’s plan is to bash Bush while he’s campaigning, after all, it’s all he’s got...


40 posted on 12/08/2011 7:11:27 PM PST by Freddd (NoPA ngineers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson