To: gandalftb
Here's some pics of what the Iranians showed compared to what we have.
![](http://www.jeffhead.com/images/iran-03.jpg)
![](http://www.jeffhead.com/images/usa-03.jpg)
Apparently those on the ground wanted to destroy what was left but were overruled by someone who did not want to enflame the Iranians. What?
My thinking would have put a JDAM on target...whther wrecked or partially intact. And if the Iranian Revolutionary Guard was already there, all the better. It's way past time we paid them back with large interest for killing US soldiers in Iraq in border incursions there.
9 posted on
12/08/2011 4:13:16 PM PST by
Jeff Head
(Liberty is not free. Never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
To: Jeff Head
We’ve already admitted that we are conducting UAV sorties over E Iran and the Iranians have been complaining.
The RQ-170 has an internal electronically armored homing ability to return it to base. This RQ-170 ran out of fuel, loitering over the target area.
We certainly could have cratered it with a JDAM, we would know it’s crash position because the RQ-170 would be pinging its GPS constantly, even after it went to ground. We can target and release JDAMs 35 miles up range from 35K+ altitude from any number of stealth aircraft.
10 posted on
12/08/2011 4:20:00 PM PST by
gandalftb
(11th MEU, 2/4 Echo, TRAP Force)
To: Jeff Head
Add this photo. No wing seams here.
![](http://img685.imageshack.us/img685/3474/bigbeast.jpg)
13 posted on
12/08/2011 4:22:38 PM PST by
gandalftb
(11th MEU, 2/4 Echo, TRAP Force)
To: Jeff Head
Well, the color is wrong and the leading edge looks funny.
16 posted on
12/08/2011 4:27:25 PM PST by
Paladin2
To: Jeff Head
at .47 in the video you can see damage on front of the wing ,looks like cardboard or paper
To: Jeff Head
My thinking would have put a JDAM on target... My thinking would have equipped it with a self-destruct device to be activated after a known interval since the last contact. IOW, if it's real, we meant for them to find it.
33 posted on
12/08/2011 4:57:23 PM PST by
Carry_Okie
(The Democrats are and always have been the Party of the Extremely Rich and the Party of Slavery.)
To: Jeff Head
Perhaps folks should ask the question of why it appears to be a similar color to "butter Jesus", as opposed to an actual military paint color.
![](http://www.funcrunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/big_butter_jesus_1.25.08.jpg)
Could it be that the Iranians forgot that the color of epoxy and fiberglass over foam isn't an official USAF camo color? Just a thought.
34 posted on
12/08/2011 5:00:05 PM PST by
Kommodor
(Terrorist, Journalist or Democrat? I can't tell the difference.)
To: Jeff Head
The color looks like the type of resin used in model kits.Here is a photo of a 1/144 RQ-170 Sentinel from HobbyLink Japan
![](http://static.hlj.com/images/mtu/mtuap-006.jpg)
The model can be purchased on line for about $30.78. It would be a simple matter to scale it up from there.
45 posted on
12/08/2011 5:55:34 PM PST by
jmcenanly
(Things will be better in 2013)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson