[izzatzo]

Note that this article is from the Washington Times, and it does not mention that Rep. Larsen is a democrat. Politico has a similar article, and it too does not mention the party affiliation of Larsen. I expected more of the Times. Obviously, if the staffers had been employed by a 'pubbie the affiliation would have been in the first sentence with the rep's name.

[Paladin2]

The Party Party at it again. TF’nK celebration.

[KarlInOhio]

Note that this article is from the Washington Times, and it does not mention that Rep. Larsen is a democrat.

It's right there in the second sentence. I was so used to the "hide the Democrat" policy that I was shocked to see it. I guess it is OK in this case because it is the staffers acting up instead of the Congressman himself.

[JoeDetweiler]

“Note that this article is from the Washington Times, and it does not mention that Rep. Larsen is a democrat.”

Geeez....the second sentence says “....the Washington Democrat’s office....” How much more do you want?

Seriously, the Washington Times is more-or-less on our side.

[Sopater]

Note that this article is from the Washington Times, and it does not mention that Rep. Larsen is a democrat.

I only know that he's a democrat because I voted against him several times when I lived in WA state.

[Crazieman]

Now who’s the idiot? Lost your cushy job!

[Sopater]

Note that this article is from the Washington Times, and it does not mention that Rep. Larsen is a democrat.

I only know that he's a democrat because I voted against him several times when I lived in WA state.

[BreitbartSentMe]

In other messages, staffers called the congressman everything from "my idiot boss" to unprintable derogatory terms such as the one George W. Bush used to refer to a New York Times reporter in 2000.

He called the senator a "Clymer"??

[EyeGuy]

Term Limits for the entire Washington DC area.

Everyone. Down to the janitors.

Heck for EVERYONE on the government teat, across the nation.