Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fight_truth_decay

No, she said “on the take for over a hundred million dollars to influence peddle...”
I don’t put things in quotes carelessly. I heard her say those EXACT words two days ago.
She said Gingrich was “on the take.”


15 posted on 12/08/2011 9:11:44 AM PST by Lady Lucky ( Merry Christmas to all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Lady Lucky
she said “on the take for over a hundred million dollars to influence peddle...”

1:46 into the interview [link above] will hear her answer last night on GBTV [Free] to Glenn's question on Fannie and can we trust Newt--I showed you mine now you can show me yours which must be out there some where in those exact terms and in context as "you heard", which I am not questioning your quote as to be taken lightly--I just have to hear and/or see it to judge for myself.

Mr Beck does fully disclaim he would vote for Bachmann if he were to vote today. But his questions were preceded by his take after speaking with Newt.

You can take money for your services rendered and "take" does not mean stole or was underhanded in any way or "on the take". You can peddle your wares [yourself] and the language is still what it is..we can interpret in different ways. http://republicanredefined.com/ other interviews.

But the Rush transcript [above] just out opens the can of worms wider in regard to trust issues of who told us what, who knew when and to my regret doesn't leave Mr. Bush off the hook either.

Thanks

18 posted on 12/08/2011 9:34:37 AM PST by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson