Posted on 12/06/2011 5:39:15 PM PST by Lazlo in PA
Heres a line of questioning you dont hear everyday, let alone it being asked of a White House Press Secretary in reference to the Commander in Chief.
During what otherwise would have been a typical White House press briefing Monday, Jay Carney fielded a real curve ball from World Net Daily reporter Lester Kinsolving, a man known for asking outlandish questions. The topic? Whether President Obama approves of bestiality in the military.
Kinsolving was referring to a recent Senate vote repealing sodomy and bestiality bans in the military.
The odd, if not uproarious exchange went something like this:
KINSOLVING: The Family Research Council and CNS News both reported a 93-to-7 U.S. Senate vote to approve a defense authorization bill that, quote, includes a provision which not only repeals the military law on sodomy, but also repeals the military ban on sex with animals, or bestiality. Does the commander-in-chief approve or disapprove of bestiality in our armed forces?
CARNEY: I dont have any comment onI dont have any comment on that. Let me go to another question.
KINSOLVING: Does the President believe this will be approved by all animal support groups, such as
CARNEY: Lets get to something more serious.
(Excerpt) Read more at theblaze.com ...
saw that you voted the other evening to rescind prohibitions on bestiality (sex with animals) in the UCMJ?
So ~ do you have preferences? Horses, sheep?
Maybe you'd like to start telling the voters about this.
i mean like this was just out of the blue!!!
Almost like finding you guys voting to declare the Moon Purple Cheese rather than Green Cheese, or to replace the Eagle with a pig or something
Really just such a surprise
Does your wife know about this change in orientation?
Question: On Passage of the Bill (S. 1867 As Amended ) Vote Number: 218 Vote Date: December 1, 2011, 08:02 PM
. . .
Vote Counts: YEAs 93
NAYs 7
Coburn (R-OK)
Harkin (D-IA)
Lee (R-UT)
Merkley (D-OR)
Paul (R-KY)
Sanders (I-VT)
Wyden (D-OR)
Isn’t there a provision that says that the human/animal sex has to be with an opposite sex animal? That’s OK, but having sex with an animal of the same gender is “forbidden”. If you’re having sex WITH AN ANIMAL what difference does it make what the gender of the ANIMAL is? What a world.
Knew it was Les before I read the article.
But what about worms or some bivalves who are both male and female?
You need to make your point.
What happens between a beard and her beau is permitted as long as there is no crying afterwards by either party.
Let me get this straight - you want to pull the credentials of the only guy in the White House press corps who actually challenges Carney on legitimate issues that almost every other reporter in the White House press corps purposefully ignores?
That there is hilarious. I dont care who ya are.
Laughing like a fool and good thing I wasn’t drinking anything at the time , otherwise it would be spewed all over the puter ~
Of course, we have our connoisseurs of gay, S&M dominatrix bestiality over there in Enumclaw, WA.
Kinda like a Michilin Man blimp.
I could almost see the waddle, feel the ground shake.
Yup. And I heard of a guy about 30 years ago in that same general area abusing a St Bernard... sort of. The dog was on top, and the cops couldn’t tell if the dog was being abused or what.
I remember from years ago. him saying: 'buggery in the barracks... buggery in the barracks'!!!!!!
If we care about our Country God is our one and only hope. Most of us have played with our lives like children and it is time for us to grow up in our faith and hope and pray for The LORD to be merciful to us and turn our us and our Country around. It won't happen without us believing, understanding that before anything else we fight not against flesh and blood but we fight a spiritual battle against wickedness in the heavenly places and the weapons we use must be spiritual.
This whole “Laws shouldn’t be based on morals” thing is as wrong as the day is long. ALL laws should be moral.
It is IMMORAL to steal, hence we have laws against that.
It is IMMORAL to kill (murder) hence we have laws against that.
It is IMMORAL to engage in certain kinds of sex, hence, there Should Be laws against that.
If you do not have laws based on Morality (Or that which is Right), then it stands to reason that the laws you get will not be Moral, but Immoral.
Is Michelle wearing a pillowcase? What is that?
I thought it was a parachute but then I saw the label.
The Democrats just don’t wish to alienate a potential liberal voting bloc for them.
if someone equates sodomy to bestiality as equals, they’re probably a perv democrat.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.