He’s not the best, but he’s better than Mitt’s D-.
Great. So we have the two lowest dogs and we are going with the lesser of the worst as always. We as a group are so stupid. We have every opportunity to pick a total package in Bachmann and she is ignored because she fights back against the “men”.
Thats not the reason. The reason is because the media has twisted her words and taken things out of context and hyped monor gaffs to the point that many people, including many conservatives, think she’s a flake.
Newt was rated as “A” by GOA in 1994. A year later he was rated a “D” by GOA. Most of us, at that time, were appalled at the rapidity of his change. Stunning...Once he became Speaker? He trashed us (RKBA). What will he do as President?
No, she is ignored because, despite a very strong start, she has succeeded in proving that she is, in fact, as stupid as the left wants us to believe.
Well, Newt’s weak on guns, but not horrible. Let’s review the pack:
Ron Paul...............A+ - and a lunatic who’d get us nuked
Rick Perry.............A - and can’t string two sentences together and would be annihilated against Obama
Michelle Bachmann......A - and is about as crazy as the left says she is
Rick Santorum..........B- - good record in Senate, but weak, milquetoast, boring, lost last election by 18 pts, percieved as a Bible-thumper, wouldn’t fight back against Obama and would lose
Newt Gingrich..........C - personal life is shambles, but balanced 4 budgets and knows how to hit back, probably has the best overall record, and might be able to use his notoriety to actually smack down Obama pretty hard
Mitt Romney............D- - weak record as governor, boring
Newt probably wins this contest by default, which is sad, really.