I had asked you to explain to me Pauls vote to give special protection to homosexuality in the Armed Forces, so what info is it that you want? Paul made statements that he believes that homosexuality needs to be treated equally to heterosexuality. How is Pauls statement defending homosexuality based upon a Constitutional viewpoint or traditional American viewpoint in any way at all? Seems to me that Paul is a pervert and a leftist.
I think what was said is that all people should be treated equal. I DO NOT SUPPORT THE LGBT? AGENDA IN ANY WAY. but at the same time you can not legislate morality.
In a RP administration i think you would see the elimination of outreach, support, and special rights for gays,