Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GregNH

I am suspicious of any lawyer who uses the honorific “Dr.” because he holds a juris doctor degree (the same degree that all lawyers get from law school). Lawyers don’t use that honorific.

And most of us use “Esq.” only when it is necessary so that the person reading the document will understand that the person who wrote or signed the document is a lawyer (that is often very important for the persons involved to know).


5 posted on 12/05/2011 9:30:08 AM PST by Notwithstanding (1998 ACU ratings: Newt=100%, Paul=88%, Santorum=84% [the last year all were in Congress])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Notwithstanding

Also, that’s a mighty windy cv with no real major accomplishments. Also, what in the world is a “general practice with a concentration in constitutional strategy”? Doesn’t sound like that would put much bread on the table.

Way too much trouble to watch crummy videos. Well reasoned written arguments are much better.


12 posted on 12/05/2011 10:08:13 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Notwithstanding
I would guess that he uses the honorific "Doctor" because he switched to an academic career (Dean of a law school, in fact).

The Esquire honorific is what has long puzzled me. Evidently, no very great number of lawyers prior to my own lifetime had thought that the honorific was needed to signal special status as a signatory on a document.

(I realize that some sort of signal is needed on documents, but my recollection from my own expert witness work in the 1980s is that the signature block typically had a printed/typed phrase such as "Attorney-at-Law." That is much more dignified, in my opinion, than Esquire [which is a feudal term that ordinarily refered to landed gentry, I believe].

13 posted on 12/05/2011 10:11:54 AM PST by the_doc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Notwithstanding
I am suspicious of any lawyer who uses the honorific “Dr.” because he holds a juris doctor degree (the same degree that all lawyers get from law school). Lawyers don’t use that honorific.

And most of us use “Esq.” only when it is necessary so that the person reading the document will understand that the person who wrote or signed the document is a lawyer (that is often very important for the persons involved to know).

This guy looks like a fine guy on our side of the table. But if you parse his credentialing, he actually looks like a marginal legal authority.

28 posted on 12/05/2011 11:40:29 AM PST by David (...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Notwithstanding

Except Esquire is not a title for lawyer, there isn’t one. It is something they started using at one point as an attempt to distinguish themselves from “common” folk. Frankly, it makes them sound like gay “escorts”.


37 posted on 12/05/2011 12:37:41 PM PST by CodeToad (Islam needs to be banned in the US and treated as a criminal enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Notwithstanding
I thought this a bit strange:

...from which he graduated Phi Beta Kappa

How does one do that, exactly? It's a fraternity, not a degree or other qualification, after all. Is he a Master of Beer Chugging?

41 posted on 12/05/2011 1:00:20 PM PST by Moltke (Always retaliate first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Notwithstanding
I am suspicious of any lawyer who uses the honorific “Dr.” because he holds a juris doctor degree (the same degree that all lawyers get from law school). Lawyers don’t use that honorific.

But a professor on a faculty does, and deserves the honor. He's teaching law, not just practicing it. Before one is a lawyer, he/she is a student. Most lawyers are not teachers. Duh! Check out his curriculum vitae -- a bit more than a local divorce lawyer, eh?

60 posted on 12/05/2011 6:55:26 PM PST by imardmd1 ((Let the Redeemed of The LORD say so ...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Notwithstanding
I am suspicious of any lawyer who uses the honorific “Dr.” because he holds a juris doctor degree (the same degree that all lawyers get from law school). Lawyers don’t use that honorific.

Not in social circles, certainly; but what about in the academic setting?
(Although I would more likely expect them to be called "professor"?)
Right or wrong, I know of a few who have done this, but in all cases it was a professor in an academic setting.
Just askin'.

But in any case, I agree about the "Esq."

67 posted on 12/06/2011 8:22:29 AM PST by Nevermore (...just a typical cracker, clinging to my Constitutional rights...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson