Posted on 12/05/2011 7:20:50 AM PST by SeekAndFind
Newt Gingrich, Herman Cain and Rick Perry have all received a little love (and by “love,” I just mean attention) at HA this weekend, so I thought I’d remind everybody of another runner by the name of Mitt Romney. For much of this primary season, he’s been the erstwhile frontrunner of a race nobody wants him to win and, every so often, I ask myself, “Why is that again?”
Then, I remember Romneycare and the oh-so-condemning ads that have already come out of the Democratic National Committee. It’s hard to make a case, as Charles Krauthammer recently so brilliantly explained, that Romney’s liberal flips are deviations from an accepted conservative core because he has no signature conservative achievements and the piece of legislation that colloquially bears his name was the blueprint for the least liked liberal legislation of at least the past century. That’s not to say Romney isn’t conservative, but just to say it’s harder to believe he’s a deep-seated conservative than a pragmatist who adapts to whatever election he wants to win at the moment.
Nevertheless, on some level, I think even conservatives within the GOP have assumed that this pragmatist would be the 2012 GOP nominee — and might even have taken some comfort in that fact. After all, as Ann Coulter has pointed out, the guy is adept at tricking liberals — and the prospect of outfoxing Obama on the campaign trail is presumably an appealing one to anybody who’s tired of the Chicago machine and the vexing way in which Obama has adapted and expanded it to fit the national scene. His questionable conservative credentials might have made him unappealing, but his presumed electability made him an acceptable eventuality.
Now, as it appears the GOP electorate might actually select Newt Gingrich as the GOP nominee and as polls show Obama would trounce the white-haired wise guy in at least the swing state of Florida, I can’t help but wonder whether more conservatives than just popular pundits are panicking just a little bit — and wishing Romney would step his game up to the slightest degree.
In case you are among the panicked few, two pieces of evidence that suggest (a) Romney does really, really want to be president but (b) still thinks it’s enough to just out-organize his opponents.
In the first place, according to data supplied by a Republican “keeping a close eye on key media markets,” Romney has spent far more on TV advertising in Iowa and New Hampshire than any of his rivals. National Journal reports:
Romney has purchased another $265,000 in television time in Iowa and New Hampshire over the next week, where his campaign is running its Right Answer ad. The vast majority of that is broadcast television in Cedar Rapids (650 gross ratings points), Des Moines (800 points), Sioux City (450 points) and on WMUR in Manchester (550 points). He also spent $13,000 on Fox News specifically in Iowa.
In the second, his team has doubled down on what The Washington Post calls “below-the-iceberg” organizational details. More from WaPo:
For Romney, a campaign built for distance, not speed, is a change from 2008, when he focused almost exclusively on the early states, thinking he had to light a fire in Iowa and keep throwing wood on it with victories in New Hampshire and South Carolina.
“This campaign strategy is more focused on actual delegates,” said Kevin Madden, a longtime Romney adviser. “It was built to withstand every different candidate scenario . . .with the understanding that what matters the most is having enough delegates to win the nomination.”
Madden is doing his part at home in Washington. The deadline to submit petitions to qualify for the District’s April 3 primary is Jan. 4. For several weeks, Madden and allies have been crisscrossing the city getting registered Republican voters to sign Romney’s petitions. The city requires 296 signatures, but Romney’s team, in keeping with its just-to-be-safe strategy, aims to gather a clean 600.
The Romney campaign claims the latter is evidence that Romney plans to work hard to “earn” the nomination — but, ultimately, organizational strategy is just that — strategy. In other words, it’s not necessarily the sort of “substance” that has vaulted Gingrich to the front of the line. What has catapulted Gingrich to the top is his perceived policy expertise.
At some point, especially in this debate-driven primary season, Romney will have to prove his policy chops. It shouldn’t be hard to do. As just one example, he has proposed the most substantive and arguably most conservative plan for entitlement reform of any of the candidates. But when have you heard him really hammer that home in a debate? As slick a speaker as the guy is, he still hasn’t mastered the debate distillation of his own ideas that would most help to link his name to conservative concepts. Whether he still has time to create a significantly conservative “debate meme” remains to be seen — but, in the midst of buying advertising and tightening organization, he should at least try.
And then he’ll get crushed like a bug against Obama.
Bottom Line: If he can’t inspire us, how’s he going to convince them?
Draft Sarah.
If Romney is the nominee, there will be a third party candidate, and they will get over 10% of the vote.
Perry/Palin, perhaps? I’m sticking with Rick, even though he’s not the best debater. This whole, “he can’t debate his way out of a paper bag” whineage reminds me of the process of becoming an attorney (hear me out!): you have to do well in undergrad, but it doesn’t matter what your degree is in. Then you have to take the LSAT, which has nothing to do with the study of law. Then you have to get your law degree, but your GPA may not have anything to do with what’s on the bar exam. Then you have to take and pass the bar exam, but your score generally has nothing to do with how good a lawyer you’ll be.
I don’t care how well he debates. I care that he’s proven he can govern, administer, lead and protect. That’s the president I want.
War of attrition is the only way he will win.
But...Wait for it.....
What if a good many of us decide we don’t want a younger McCain and instead of waiting for a Sarah, well, we actually do decide to send a message to establishment by staying home and sitting on our hands?
I’ve had enough of “this is the most important election of our lifetime” and the overly used “Anyone but...”.
F off and get a serious candidate who represents our ideals.
There will be a Republican winner, that’s a fact. But, does it have to be the deep pocketed user who is only in the race to pump up his genealogy resume?
Anyone voting 3rd party in this election is guilty of treason, in my book.
Well, that is, if 'bam is the dem nominee. (There is a chance he'll drop out-- my hunch.) If Hill heads the ticket, then 3rd's an option.
This is all beside the point. Newt seems the only candidate who has some idea of where he wants us to go, and he seems to revere the constitution.
No difference between Mitt and Obama. Mitt might even be more dangerous because he's a stealth socialist. At least with Obama, with Republican-controlled Senate and House, we get gridlock.
I'd say there is: one's an ambitious politician, schooled and brought up in America by God fearing people, who has enjoyed success in this country --in private as well as public spheres-- and who, despite wrong-headed past notions-- seems to revere this nation and comprehend its singularity as the greatest in recorded civilization.
The other...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.