OK, let’s examine the typical thinking on this forum.
If we round up a million illegal immigrants and send them back, to Mexico, let’s say, what makes you think that the Nation will admit them?
How about two million?
I can hear it now: “Jose’ Who? We have no records.”
When reason finally surfaces you will see that we’re stuck with the big numbers and Newt has the best workable plan.
This is the “we can’t do it” attitude. This is outright ridiculous. If Mexico (or any other country) starts opposing the policy, we can cancel their visas. They have to take them back. Besides, we can simply push them over the border. Mexico can do whatever they want to these illegals (give them money, deport them to Guatemala, execute them). I don’t care.
In anycase, new illegals will not come here, and many existing ones will go back, if we get serious. Newt is the only one who openly advocates for Amnesty.
I can’t understand why any freeper is pushing for Amnesty. Bush, McCain, Newt. Three amnesty freaks in a row.
Anyway, you are right. Only Newt has open plan (to surrender).
This is the “we can’t do it” attitude. This is outright ridiculous. If Mexico (or any other country) starts opposing the policy, we can cancel their visas. They have to take them back. Besides, we can simply push them over the border. Mexico can do whatever they want to these illegals (give them money, deport them to Guatemala, execute them). I don’t care.
In anycase, new illegals will not come here, and many existing ones will go back, if we get serious. Newt is the only one who openly advocates for Amnesty.
I can’t understand why any freeper is pushing for Amnesty. Bush, McCain, Newt. Three amnesty freaks in a row.
Anyway, you are right. Only Newt has open plan (to surrender).