Has it yet occurred to you that your pursuit of perfection results in Romney as the nominee? Is Milt perfect in your eyes? ... Of course that was a rhetorical question. You don’t have to now step up and defend Milt as a good copnservative, since he has never been even close to that. But Newt is a conservative. He may not be the perfect conservative in your eyes, but he is the best bet to overcome the Milt ‘designed by media destiny’. Until you see that, your insistence serves Milt Rominey’s agenda/goal, which is ‘nomination by default’. [Rominy rhymes with hominy, the huskless corn product.]
IMHO it is too early to settle on the anti-Romney candidate. I don’t seek perfection in a candidate. There are better anti-Romney choices than Gingrich.
And when the anti-Romney choice becomes apparent, I will support the anti-Romney choice (as long as it is not Huntsman).
Why should we settle for someone who “will do” (as the title of the article suggests, and which I agree with), when we can have “great”?