Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Notwithstanding

Thank you for that very intelligent post. It is an interesting question b/c until the egg implants, it can never live. I guess you could talk about the difference between fertilization and conception.

In any event, Newt’s stance is firmly opposed to conception b/c obviously that concerns an egg that has implanted.


51 posted on 12/04/2011 9:39:51 PM PST by Lou Budvis (Newt/Marco '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: Lou Budvis
You are incorrect on several accounts. First, the unimplanted embryos are alive, they are living without being implanted. Freezing them 'suspends' their growing process bu does not kill them for a fairly long time, so they remain living even when frozen, just suspended in life.

There is not such a thing as an 'implanted egg'. The 'egg' (I take it you mean to write ovum, not egg, we are not chickens) once fertilized is no longer an egg, it is a zygotic embryo.

Lastly, it might in fact be a good discussion to discuss the vagaries of 'conception' and 'fertilization'. There are stages in the processes that we conservatives really ought to get a better understanding of, so the progressives cannot baffle us with bullshit as they do now via their dead-soul media whores.

60 posted on 12/04/2011 9:59:17 PM PST by MHGinTN (Some, believing they cannot be deceived, it's impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson