Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: trebb

Newt climbed to the top, he did not float.

Romney has been sliding down - he has not floated to the top.

This year’s would-be-Reagans (a la “Fred Thompson”) have been given a chance, but they have not lived up to expectations. Reagan did leave big shoes to fill.

Newt did not sparkle and shine and did not come in a fancy irresistable box. But in the end he has stood out as the one who is capable of defeating Obama, selling conservative ideas, and leading the nation on day one.

The rhinestones have lost their luster.
The gemstone has proven to be valuable despite its imperfections.


23 posted on 12/04/2011 6:04:04 AM PST by Notwithstanding (1998 ACU ratings: Newt=100%, Paul=88%, Santorum=84% [the last year all were in Congress])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Notwithstanding
I agree with your philosophical post. I have no problem voting for Newt under current conditions.

As happens from time to time, you intercepted an aimed dart - I was telling my target continuing the Perry bashing made no sense since he (and many other Perry bashers)can't stand the thought of Mitt or Newt. They have gone over the brink and have nobody left to support unless they believe their dreams and a super-conservative is on the horizon, riding hard, his horses flanks wet and breath hard as his hooves beat the tattoo of perfect conservative freedom - both horse and rider glowing with an aura of freedom and neither will falter.

While I will look and hope for better, I'll vote for Newt without compunction.

26 posted on 12/04/2011 6:21:52 AM PST by trebb ("If a man will not work, he should not eat" From 2 Thes 3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson