To: Beelzebubba
It’s Newt. He has his definite weaknesses, but so did Reagan, who would have been excoriated by some purist whiners here
No Newt for me. Not another McCain and a repeat of 2008
52 posted on
12/03/2011 11:12:47 AM PST by
Rooivalk
To: Rooivalk
All Newt did was win the House back in 94 , force Clinton to reform welfare, and balance the budget.
Your analogy to McCain is nonsense, just because he sat on a couch next to Pelosi he's some kind of marxist?
82 posted on
12/03/2011 11:18:47 AM PST by
Rome2000
(OBAMA IS A COMMUNIST CRYPTO-MUSLIM)
To: Rooivalk
its got to be Newt now.....God, please not Romney....
106 posted on
12/03/2011 11:22:11 AM PST by
Razwan
(Yeah, yeah, I know...Razwan, member since 30 June 2000)
To: Rooivalk
No Newt for me. Not another McCain and a repeat of 2008
Newt isn’t as conservative as I’d like, but he’s vastly more conservative than McCain.
And McCain’s campaign was basically a six-month-long concession speech. Newt will fight hard, and fight to win.
Newt is great at expressing the ideas of conservatism very effectively which will advance the cause even if he continues to stumble in non-conservative ways as he sometimes has.
At his current age he comes across quite genially, so all the media efforts to demonize him are disproved by watching him.
Putting Newt into perspective on the political spectrum in the past 50 years, compared to the GOP nominees he’s less conservative than Goldwater, slightly less or the same as Reagan, and more conservative than the rest (based on how they governed, if elected).
221 posted on
12/03/2011 11:54:15 AM PST by
Atlas Sneezed
(Author of BullionBible.com - Makes You a Precious Metal Expert, Guaranteed.)
To: Rooivalk
McCain was mealy mouthed and lacked the fire Newt has..what if Cain endorses Newt?
302 posted on
12/03/2011 12:37:16 PM PST by
katiedidit1
("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson