[COBOL2Java]

You may have a point. Like the rest of us here, I do not know if the allegations are true or false. However, our commitment must be to our values first - including "family" values - and to any particular candidate second. No candidate deserves blind, unquestioning allegiance.

So, I guess from your reasoning, Axelrod can go trot out some two-bit gold digger to make up stories about your preferred candidate, and you'll abandon him as well?

[Yulee]

So, I guess from your reasoning, Axelrod can go trot out some two-bit gold digger to make up stories about your preferred candidate, and you'll abandon him as well?

EXACTLY!

We have a local “progressive” paper controlled by the New York Times. Most folks outside of the city look at the paper endorsements and voted the opposite. We have seen enough of this slime in the past to recognize the source.

Go Cain!!!!!!

[tjd1454]

So, I guess from your reasoning, Axelrod can go trot out some two-bit gold digger to make up stories about your preferred candidate, and you'll abandon him as well?

That's obviously ridiculous. Our commitment should be to Truth first - above any candidate. False allegations are just as reprehensible as attempts to excuse or cover-up wrongdoing.

I for one will withhold judgment until the truth comes out. If there is no confirmation of the allegations, then they must not be accepted. But, heaven forbid, they are confirmed, then we must not keep our heads in the sand.