Sorry, but I dont accept that this widely-assumed-to-exist sub-category of supposedly non-problematic Muslims exists at all, regardless of what labels we use. Even the most genuinely nominal, congenial, peaceful, cooperative Muslims out there are still, in some small way, contributing to the problem that we face simply by identifying themselves as Muslim at all. Their chosen self-identity alone contributes to the momentum of the Sharia agenda on a broader level.
Think about it this way: If you knew that the ideology that you were identifying yourself with taught all these horrible and destructive things, and you genuinely felt that they were horrible and destructive, and you could see that there were many people all over the world that shared your ideological label carrying out these horrible and destructive instructions every hour of every day, causing misery everywhere, why on Earth would you continue to identify yourself with the ideology at all? Would we not have considered a nominal Nazi, or a nominal State Shintoist during World War 2 to be problematic no matter how genuinely casual they might have been about it?
We need to stop kidding ourselves. Its perfectly legitimate to hold people responsible for the ideologies with which they associate themselves, no matter how casually they do it. Casual, cooperative Muslims dont need space, they need to be held to account.
The commenter’s pseudonym de plume is “out of context (TM)”
Well said.
Or as Travis McGee put it: “Radical islam is an insane murder cult. Moderate islam is its Trojan Horse in the west.”