Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: native texan; maryz; george76; All

I have been studying the CFLs now for 15 years. For several years they have had warm and cool light, and daylight type illumination. I changed to all CFLs 15 years ago and my electric bill immediately dropped from $28 per month to $17 per month. CFLs use about 1/4th the electricity of incandescents. When I look at LED lights they never seem to say what the electric saving is, unlike the CFLs which clearly state, for example that a 60 watt bulb luminosity burns about 13 watts. I figure I have saved at least $2,000 in the past 15 years on bills alone, not to mention what I have also saved on light bulbs.

However, if people want to throw their money away on incandescents, I think they should have that right. It must be nice to have enough money to throw it away, at lease they will give me a small increase in Social Security this year for a change.


52 posted on 12/03/2011 10:13:31 PM PST by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: gleeaikin

I tried the cfl’s. The only light I use all the time is one for reading, and I found, though the light bill went down a couple of dollars with the cfl, it bothered my eyes more and more. It was such a relief to go back to an incandescent — my eyes seemed 10 years younger!


62 posted on 12/04/2011 2:17:53 AM PST by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson