Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: katiedidit1
A great debater is not high on my list of qualifications to be POTUS.

That's why I still prefer Perry to Romney or Newt!

And yes, all three have their problems w/ Conservatives.

25 posted on 12/02/2011 12:02:39 PM PST by TexasCajun (Fast & Furious , Solyndra & Light Squared would be enough to impeach any White President !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: TexasCajun

I don’t think two easy-to-mock stereotypical Texans lacking statesmanlike stage presence in a row would be good for the USA.

Image is important, and on the world stage, Perry would be even more of a joke than W ended up being.

I don’t think that caricature of W was fair, but it existed and it was widespread.

Perry’s “oops” moment was so damaging NOT because it was a big mistake, bur because it symbolized the utter lack of gravitas he had exhibited in all the debates prior to that “oops”. The “oops” confirmed our fears (based on our observations of him in debates) that Perry might consistently embarrass the USA on the world stage.

Gravitas is necessary in a president. Perry has none.


39 posted on 12/02/2011 12:13:38 PM PST by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: TexasCajun

Yeah. Perry, granted, is not sufficiently conservative, but what the election of that radical showed me is that the MANAGEMENT aspect of it is at least as important as ideology.


76 posted on 12/02/2011 1:57:49 PM PST by ichabod1 (Vote for Herman Cain 2012! Stop Letting Them Drive Our Candidates Away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson