Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: guitarplayer1953

The law does not refer to “terrorists” as the group to which it applies. It specifically references those fighting on behalf of named organizations such as al Qeada.

Does anyone seriously contend that the US military cannot defend Americans against terrorists if the attack is made on American soil? Really? Where is that found in the Constitution?


15 posted on 12/01/2011 9:59:14 PM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Sherman Logan
It specifically references those fighting on behalf of named organizations such as al Qeada.

Not quite. It specifically references those declared by the government to be fighting on behalf of those organizations.

We have courts to decide if such declarations of guilt have any basis in fact.

The courts do not work on real battlefields during a firefight. But even the German saboteurs on US soil during WW2 got at least a military trial in fairly quick order.

41 posted on 12/02/2011 7:29:17 AM PST by slowhandluke (It's hard to be cynical enough in this age.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Sherman Logan
this law will allow them to do so. Up to this point the US military has not and can not be used against citizens of the USA. This law ill allow them to do so now.
47 posted on 12/02/2011 3:03:50 PM PST by guitarplayer1953
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson