Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: achilles2000
Doesn’t the Cain campaign understand that it needs to present credible facts? Not guilt by alleged association, not hunches, but cold hard facts.

How about we take that statement and turn it around a little?

Doesn’t the Cain campaign THE MEDIA understand that it needs to present credible facts? Not guilt by alleged association, not hunches, but cold hard facts.

I wish the same courtesy was extended to Mr. Cain.

25 posted on 12/01/2011 5:01:09 PM PST by Never on my watch (WTF happened to my country?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Never on my watch

paying some woman’s monthly bills without the wife’s notice doesn’t smell so righteous to me. Thank God we didn’t find out about this stuff after he was representing us in the general election. then we’d be screwed like his poor wife was. she trusted him and found out he is taking care of a second woman’s pills. men don’t just take of women’s bills behind their wives back.


30 posted on 12/01/2011 5:03:53 PM PST by GOP Poet (Time for Bambi and his commie crew to go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: Never on my watch
cold hard facts

The cold hard facts are that the National Restaurant Association settled two harassment claims against Cain in 1999. It was *not* normal for a CEO to have a harassment claim filed against them during that period, much less two.

The NRA settled both claims, although in 1998 even the EEOC only found cause to investigate harassment claims in 60% of claims. And that was just to investigate them.

The NRA settled them for $35K and $45K, which was *way* more than nuisance claims were settled for in 1999. A 1998 study showed that the average settlement of a harassment *lawsuit* (which settles for a much greater amount than a mere claim) was $38.5K, which includes those settlements in the hundreds of thousands of dollars for serial and institutional harassment, and the truly obscene harassment cases. Nuisance lawsuits (if you know your math) were therefore settled for much, much less than $38.5K. Nuisance claims that never went to suit would have settled for less than that. I've posted the link to the study several times and Cain supporters say, "well, I don't need a scientific study, my friend said those are nuisance amounts."

$35K and $45K say they were not nuisance claims. Two of them say the NRA had a problem with Cain in 1998-1999.

Those are cold, hard facts.

As for other women, I have no cold, hard facts - other than Ginger White and what Cain said today about giving her money and not telling his wife. But not everything about Cain is without cold, hard facts.

36 posted on 12/01/2011 5:11:58 PM PST by Scoutmaster (You knew the job was dangerous when you took it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: Never on my watch

I agree with you completely.


103 posted on 12/01/2011 9:22:23 PM PST by achilles2000 ("I'll agree to save the whales as long as we can deport the liberals")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson