Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: yldstrk
People have the right to defend themselves. Period. With a gun. Period.

The policy that should be applied is: if he's too dangerous to have a gun, then why is he loose on the street?

I have a friend who got convicted on a drug charge many years ago. He plea bargained accepting a felony conviction in exchange for probation and no jail time (which in hindsight was a mistake, but he was younger then). He'd like to get his gun rights re-instated, but the legal costs would be several thousands of dollars, and it's not in his budget right now.

11 posted on 12/01/2011 7:35:27 AM PST by PapaBear3625 (During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: PapaBear3625
He'd like to get his gun rights re-instated, but the legal costs would be several thousands of dollars, and it's not in his budget right now.

Sounds like he need to get the ACLU to take his case pro-bono. They love druggies! (He doesn't have to tell them he's reformed.)

23 posted on 12/01/2011 8:16:26 AM PST by JimRed (Excising a cancer before it kills us waters the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: PapaBear3625

The policy that should be applied is: if he’s too dangerous to have a gun, then why is he loose on the street?

+1


39 posted on 12/01/2011 9:56:27 AM PST by Natufian (t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson