Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Can Congress Steal Your Constitutional Freedoms?
Townhall.com ^ | December 1, 2011 | Judge Andrew Napolitano

Posted on 12/01/2011 6:19:22 AM PST by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
To: Roccus

Delta Force was present. Because of that, I have no respect for DF at all.


21 posted on 12/01/2011 7:44:58 AM PST by BCR #226 (02/07 SOT www.extremefirepower.com...The BS stops when the hammer drops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BillM
That's true. But it's idiotic to lump them all together and give them blanket credit. There were three basic groups,same as today. You had the big government federalists, the small government antifeds, and the mushy middle.

It was the mushy middle that agreed to sign on to the massive expansion of national power in exchange for a bill of rights. Any antifederalist worth his salt opposed the Constitution tooth and nail.

22 posted on 12/01/2011 7:53:40 AM PST by Huck (LIBERTY is the object.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The original purpose of Congress was to ensure their enforcement...


23 posted on 12/01/2011 7:56:39 AM PST by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KrisKrinkle

You must be the FR hermit.


24 posted on 12/01/2011 8:06:57 AM PST by 556x45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Roccus

Military garb, military weapons, military tactics. If someone opens up on you (unarmed) with a 7.62 FMJ M-16 does it really matter if they are Army or National Guard? If it walks like a duck......


25 posted on 12/01/2011 8:42:00 AM PST by Thermalseeker (Wanna keep livin' with your momma? Vote for Obama. Tired of the pain? Vote CAIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Huck

I don’t dispute that but the fact is that The Bill of Rights protected the states and the individuals. That is why every elected person must swear to support and defend the Constitution. The problem has been erosion. It is time to shore it up. We the People need to build a retaining wall and maintain it.


26 posted on 12/01/2011 8:48:01 AM PST by BillM (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Thermalseeker

Yeah, you’re right. Why let a little truth enter the discussion.


27 posted on 12/01/2011 8:49:50 AM PST by Roccus (POLITICIAN...............a four letter word spelled with ten letters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Roccus
LOL! Yeah, tell that to the guy with the M-16 when he's got it pointed at your head. Truth? HA! That's a good one! Man, have you ever got a lot to learn about totalitarianism....
28 posted on 12/01/2011 8:52:49 AM PST by Thermalseeker (Wanna keep livin' with your momma? Vote for Obama. Tired of the pain? Vote CAIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Thermalseeker

I was challenging the veracity of the judge’s statement. You challenged the veracity of mine. Now you say I don’t know about totalitarianism. Revisionist history is a tool of the despot and ignorance is its workshop....I leave you to wallow in it.


29 posted on 12/01/2011 8:57:29 AM PST by Roccus (POLITICIAN...............a four letter word spelled with ten letters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer

If you followed this thread after your #19 you’ll see my wisecrack wasn’t far off the mark.


30 posted on 12/01/2011 8:59:55 AM PST by Roccus (POLITICIAN...............a four letter word spelled with ten letters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: TheBigIf

Oh please. 911 was a result of govt incompetence, not the absence of more police state laws and bs.


31 posted on 12/01/2011 9:03:25 AM PST by GlockThe Vote (The Obama Adminstration: 2nd wave of attacks on America after 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: GlockThe Vote

So says you. I disagree.

The government incompetence that lead to 9/11 was written into the laws and lack thereof. The intentional wall setup by democrats (and willing republican accomplishes) that restricted the sharing of intelligence, laws that restricted investigations based upon phony civil rights concerns and a host of other Code Pink like actions taken by many leftists in government intended to help weaken the United States National Security.

You may want to blame the hard-working men and women of our intelligence community but the blame doesn’t lie there but instead lies at the hands of the legislators and the left-wing terrorist civil rights crowd like the Code Pink democrats and the Code Pink libertarians like Ron Paul and Judge Napolitano.


32 posted on 12/01/2011 9:14:41 AM PST by TheBigIf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: BillM
The Bill of Rights protected the states and the individuals

In practice it's been a mixed bag.

33 posted on 12/01/2011 9:14:49 AM PST by Huck (LIBERTY is the object.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: TheBigIf

Really? You mean like the FBI not following up on the flight school owner warning them and giving info on the students?

You mean like the visa applications that were insanely flawed that should NEVER have been approved?


34 posted on 12/01/2011 9:21:02 AM PST by GlockThe Vote (The Obama Adminstration: 2nd wave of attacks on America after 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: GlockThe Vote

It was not that the FBI simply did not follow up but that provisions in the law (the famous Wall) prevented certain types of follow up from happening. You had an environment created by our legislators of demonizing law enforcement based upon bogus civil rights claims.

This bogus civil rights excuse for weakening United States National Security efforts is the same mentality that is being promoted in this thread.

‘oh the travesty of wanting to detain a terrorist without a trial’ has Code Pink leftists and Code Pink libertarians crying foul. They are like the ‘terrorist civil rights’ movement and they are the cause of 9/11 as well.


35 posted on 12/01/2011 9:44:22 AM PST by TheBigIf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: TheBigIf

Nonsense. The fbi never did its job due to incompetence not lack of laws.


36 posted on 12/01/2011 9:48:15 AM PST by GlockThe Vote (The Obama Adminstration: 2nd wave of attacks on America after 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: TheBigIf

There’s no fix for this law. It’s just plain a stupid totalitarian law that has no useful purpose, hell they aren’t even trying to give it a proper smoke screen like the wars on terror or drugs. They’re just making a grab for power. The “fix” is to shoot every no good SOB that voted for it, short of that I suppose we could try to vote them out, better be careful though, they might arrest their opponents.


37 posted on 12/01/2011 9:51:36 AM PST by discostu (How Will I Laugh Tomorrow When I Can't Even Smile Today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Roccus

The GAO says they (US Army and National Guard) were there and they spent at least a million dollars on the raid.

http://usgovinfo.about.com/library/weekly/bl090599.htm

It is my belief that the mockup built and used to train the ATF for the raid was built on Fort Hood property.

The infamous US News? picture of the crew “cleaning” the site after it was partially bull-dozed, using sifter-screens, looks like military to me. The one long, lanky dude in fatigues on the roof above the hole in the pantry roof looks suspiciously like Weasly Clark to me.

The FBI agent in charge of the final days was the same guy convicted of destroying evidence at the Randy Weaver siege site.

I wish it was not so, but our government has a long record of attacking citizens, dating back to the thirties and beyond! If they have ever been punished I sure haven’t heard of it!!


38 posted on 12/01/2011 9:51:40 AM PST by Howie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: GlockThe Vote

You are 100% wrong.

It was due to bad laws and a lack of the proper laws that lead to 9/11.

There are instances every single day of someone in the FBI or other areas of law enforcement not doing their job well but with the proper laws, whereas agencies work together, acts of terrorism are still stopped due to the proper legal framework that allows for due diligence in recognizing and stopping acts of terrorism.


39 posted on 12/01/2011 9:54:26 AM PST by TheBigIf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: discostu

The law doesn’t even apply to American citizens (from what I have heard) and it is just a bunch of tin-foil hat BS from the Paultard crowd that claims this is some great threat to everyone. It is no different than the lies and BS these Code Pinko losers spouted about the Patriot Act, the Iraq war, Gitmo, etc…

If you want to follow a bunch of Code Pink type losers who defended the terrorist supporting dictator, Saddam Hussein then let’s hear it. I personally am tired of the anti-American National Defense crowd that is against all and everything that we try to do to prevent further attacks here at home.


40 posted on 12/01/2011 9:58:27 AM PST by TheBigIf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson