In all honesty, I don’t think Gingich would be a bad president to have, unlike how I feel about Romney. Gingrich would lay waste (as much as possible) the executive extablishment. And that is where liberty is losing ground.
He is not an Obama, who doesn’t like legislatures or any check to his power. Gingrich would be more likely to reverse executive orders than put them into place. And I can see him going to individual agencies to ask them “what is it you do here? We don’t need this done.” Similar to how he got rid of the elevator operators and ice deliver to offices with refrigerators.
Gingrich also has a respect for the congress. And if a conservative congress is elected to thwart his occasional Rino tendencies, then we’ll be better off.
We need someone who can rein in the execustive establishment and in my opinion that’s either Cain, Gingrich, or Paul. I’d love to see the three of them battle it out in the primaries and caucuses.
And yet it is Rick Perry, as a governor, who is battling the EPA, Big Education, trial lawyers and intrusive, job stifling federal dictates (and winning battles) -- "I will make Washington D.C. as inconsequential in you lives as possible" -- Rick Perry. He's steered Texas through the Obama economy and succeeded.