Rush isn’t on MY radio for the purpose of having him screen out the truth.
I’m talking about his listenership, not the media, the dems, the libs etc.
Unless you heard or saw Cain’s own comment, you would not find much coverage that he has called this woman a friend, but claims he was only trying to help her financially.
Rush joined the LSM in covering that up, and proceeded only to attack the woman.
What a hypocritical decision by Rush...attack the woman while covering up the fact Cain admits having a friendship with her and trying to help her financially.
Cain only got on the outs with her after she went public claiming a long time affair.
The two facedness and double standard made my blood boil.
There has to be more to this story, just based on what Cain himself admits. And I do want to know it, whatever the truth is.
I’ll stay tuned for the truth, but from Rush? Doubtful.
You have a right to be disturbed that, by omission, Rush makes a statement. It is about the greater battle with him, and his respect for the brain of his audience. We are likely going under, which makes some conservative’’s sexcapades very small potatoes, especially if it should be traced to another Republican. Just my 2 cents. I do agree with you that he went after the women who are, so far, all mouth and no blue dress. Of course, something is fishy when this financial assistance is outside her knowledge.