Cain says there was no sex — so how could it have been “sex for cash”? We can’t accuse her of being a prostitute if we are also saying Cain is telling the truth. Well, I guess we CAN, but it’s not very logical.
Sure it is. She's making the claim herself, there was sex and there was cash. It's entirely reasonable to infer a connection and say she is claiming she committed prostitution. Burden of proof on her to demonstrate otherwise.
I want Cain out of the race on merit (or technically, lack of merit); not at the signal of some floozy with a previous libel judgment against her. She needs another lawsuit on her.
I believed Cain against all the others that claimed harassment because he looked at them the wrong way.
But his desperate, single woman with her personal history who can produce cell calls and text messages is trouble for a man who is running for the presidential nominee of the party that is suppose have the better morals.
But wait, is this latest woman from Chicago too?