Posted on 11/29/2011 9:53:06 PM PST by Apollo5600
Read the article at the link. Read what L. Lin Wood had to say. All of it. Please.
All I ever saw was the Voice Stress Analysis, done for both Cain and Bialeks press conferences. Cain was truthful, Bialek was not. 95% accuracy.
Sorry. You have it right. It was a voice stress test. Not a lie detector test.
Thanks for clarifying/confirming. The media puts out enough false info w/o us doing it too. We have to keep each other honest. :-)
That’s ok though, because a VSA is 95% accurate, whereas a polygraph is only 50% accurate.
You can’t sue everybody, even if you can crush each one.
The Dems can keep producing accusers until the cows come home.
[ What should he sue them for? ]
To force them to PROVE something.. anything..
AND......... get him a bodacious sound byte.. maybe some honor..
Quite the opposite. I don't know what to believe with this nonsense because of the ridiculous way he and the lawyer are handling it. Let's be honest, Cain is far from solid when it comes to much past 999. Pop up issues like this and random question on just about anything but the flat tax. He even said in an interview that he has no idea about foreign policy and didn't think he needed to because there are people for that.
"I'm not supposed to know anything about foreign policy," said Republican presidential hopeful Herman Cain the other day after fumbling a question about President Obama's actions in Libya. "Because you run for president [people say] you need to have the answer. No, you don't! No, you don't!"
OK. That was fine with me because he was a successful business man and I thought he would really have the best people for a particular job around him. So far we have zero proof that he has such people around him at this important point in his campaign.
Beyond 999, why do you think he is the best candidate for the job at this juncture after seeing his performance so far?
Deny, lie, deny, lie again, blame Whitey, blame Perry, blame Romney, trash accusers ala Clinton, have your lawyer say that what 2 consenting adults do in the bedroom is nobody,s business then deny ain’t giving’ me a tingle up my leg. If Herman is innocent he needs to put an adult in charge.
I read it... only means stuff to some lawyer..
Cain needs to get AGGRESSIVE... you know.. HIT BACK!..
[ The Dems can keep producing accusers until the cows come home. ]
After he wins one or two he can shine the rest of them on..
Voice stress analysis, to the extent it's valid, is a form of lie detection. If it works, it has obvious advantages over the traditional machine: You don't need the consent of the subject, and the subject is not subjected to the stress of the machine, possibly affecting accuracy. As Dick Nixon noted, "I don't know anything about lie detectors other than they scare the hell out of people."
Deny, lie, deny, lie again, blame Whitey, blame Perry, blame Romney, trash accusers ala Clinton, have your lawyer say that what 2 consenting adults do in the bedroom is nobody,s business then deny ain’t giving’ me a tingle up my leg. If Herman is innocent he needs to put an adult in charge.
You got it right.
First he didn't handle Bialek’s accusations right because he didn't get out in front of it.
Now he isn't handling this right because he did get out in front of it.
A) Which is it?
B) What “should” he be doing instead?
Specifically. Not simply “put an adult in charge,” and not “you know, hit back!”
I suspect we have our share here. Those, and various RINO operatives trying to spread FUD wherever and whenever they can.
They are all broke dick bitches.
Are you sure?
I posted this a few times today as well. I got it at NRO Corner. I don’t see how I am wrong in how I am reading it. This was not the response to make when your campaign is being dogged with this BS. Adding this to the weird response from Woods yesterday does not add up for me the way you want it to. Personally, I would have hit back hard and fast if someone accused me of sleeping around for 13 years behind my wifes back. Not some brief statement and then talk about deliberating about the situation this week and whether he can maintain support.
And after winning a huge payout, that the women cannot pay and won’t pay, then what?
Each time Wood has to go to court on Cain’s behalf, it probably costs 50 grand. How many times can Cain afford to sue women who have little in the way of assets?
Especially when the Dems can find a thousand times the number of false accusers than Cain can possibly afford to sue.
I think the best tactic is to grind forward, win hearts. At some point, if the Dems keep bringing out women is that these accusers are going to bore the public, especially if there’s no evidence to back it up.
We need to support Cain, as a person and as a Republican.
And after winning a huge payout, that the women cannot pay and won’t pay, then what?
Each time Wood has to go to court on Cain’s behalf, it probably costs 50 grand. How many times can Cain afford to sue women who have little in the way of assets?
Especially when the Dems can find a thousand times the number of false accusers than Cain can possibly afford to sue.
I think the best tactic is to grind forward, win hearts. At some point, if the Dems keep bringing out women is that these accusers are going to bore the public, especially if there’s no evidence to back it up.
We need to support Cain, as a person and as a Republican.
Are you suggesting that Herman has no honor?
I thought this latest broke dick bitch had evidence?
Where is it, hoss?
Yes, I’m quite certain they were paid above the table all honest like, and will report that income to the IRS....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.