Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nonamer

“Either way, the government has no business taking this kid.”

If doctors say the kid’s health is in imminent danger because of the obesity, then why doesn’t the government have business there? They can take a kid if you are beating them to death but not if you are feeding them to death?


82 posted on 11/29/2011 8:48:35 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Boogieman
If doctors say the kid’s health is in imminent danger because of the obesity, then why doesn’t the government have business there?

Imminent danger? Really? How about backing that up or defining exactly what danger is "imminent" with a 10 year olds health because he is overweight.

They can take a kid if you are beating them to death but not if you are feeding them to death?

Feeding them to death? Are we going to write that into law now? Maybe we should outlaw Happy Meals too. Or, maybe you have it all wrong. Maybe it's not a food problem. Maybe it's a "sits on his ass all day playing video games and watching TV" problem? Do you really expect government to legislate exactly what is good health for kids and punish families if they don't meet those guidelines?
91 posted on 11/29/2011 10:52:43 AM PST by nonamer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson