Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nathanbedford

Yeah cuz it makes sense to transfer one’s support from a candidate where there are innuendos but no solid proof to a candidate where there IS proof of affairs (well, okay, maybe he was just window shopping for the next wife before the fire sale). Sorry, but that’s NOT going to happen. It makes no sense. Sheesh, there’s no logic around here anymore. Oh, and Gingrich is a pandering Washington insider who is probably the best chameleon in politics, playing conservative, global warming enthusiast, conservative, health care mandate supporter, conservative, womanizer, conservative...

Cindie


100 posted on 11/28/2011 10:10:11 PM PST by gardencatz (I'm lucky enough to live, walk & breathe among heroes! I am the mother of a US Marine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: gardencatz

Ouch. Good one.


107 posted on 11/28/2011 10:18:30 PM PST by AmericanInTokyo (RINO Establishment's next move: State GOP parties boot conservative candidates from future debates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson