In order to prove the gas chambers were a lie they’re going to need to find those missing people they killed in them. They’re going to need to prove the pictures taken by British and American GIs that liberated the gas chamber camps were faked.
Anyone trying to say the gas chambers were not real is nothing but a islamic propagandist. I guess they wouldn’t mind if we found one of those gas chambers and used it on them. No worries, right? I mean if they were not real then there is nothing to fear by being placed into one.
They’ll become more and more aggressive as the WWII generation dies off and eyewitnesses and survivors become extinct. Like the Enola Gay exhibit in the late 1990’s, they float a balloon once in a while knowing that sooner or later the time will be right to rewrite history because the voices of dissent will be silent.
I’ve been to Dauchau,seen the ovens used to dispose of the bodies.Once you’ve seen for yourself,the ranting of these insects really really pisses you off.
Anyone trying to say the gas chambers were not real is nothing but a islamic propagandist. I guess they wouldn’t mind if we found one of those gas chambers and used it on them. No worries, right? I mean if they were not real then there is nothing to fear by being placed into one.
The holocaust was real, the camps were real, the gas chambers existed and the ovens were real. But the vast majority of deaths have been shown to have been by disease and starvation, with smaller numbers shot. The gas chambers were shown to have been for delousing clothing (which was a huge problem) and the type of poisonous gas used took a long time to build up to killing strength and then be safely exgassed to the atmosphere without killing people in the camp. They were also fairly close to occupied quarters, which meant outgassing had to have been done very slowly. Same problem with the ovens - to few ovens taking too long to burn too many bodes in the time alloted.
In other words, the numbers and the safety requirements don't add up, because the commonly held story involves millions of people, not even hundreds of thousands.
Fact is, you don't need gas and ovens for killing those millions - disease and starvation work just fine. But any time someone questions gas and ovens in particular, they are slandered as holocause deniers, which is very curious.
After all, if the holocause is acknowledged, why does gas and ovens HAVE to be the main method of killing, even when they can, and have been shown to be grossly inadequate for the size of the job attributed to them, and when there are easily verified alternatives to having achieved the same level of mass murder? That's what I find so curious.