Any rational person will have to acknowledge all of our candidates have their flaws, no one is perfect. The positive about Perry is that he has tried to stem the flow of illegals and the fed refuse to do their job. Perry has a very good record.
The "big pharma" charge is ridiculous if you're basing the whole charge on the $5000 contribution from Merck. This is peanuts and we can probably find related charges against all of the others. This too, is a non issue. NAFTA? Then we're going to have to examine all the other's positions on NAFTA. Dream Act? Perry's example of Dream Act is different from the national Dream act.
Unless you have only started visiting Perry threads today there is plenty of evidence of Perry's problems listed. Do a search.
“Unless you have only started visiting Perry threads today there is plenty of evidence of Perry’s problems listed. Do a search.”
Agreed.
“You’re taking the short cut.”
This is the penultimate liberal tactic. What it really means is “You’ve quickly and concisely refuted my liberal, nonsense, babble talk, and what I want you to do is spend a few hours arguing with me, while I cut and paste my response, thereby wasting your time, after which I’ll just ignore you anyway.”
Rick Perry is a big government liberal, and we’re not going to buy into his campaign. If I want criminals given perks for invading my home, I’ll vote Rick Perry. If I want Executive Orders saying what will be injected into my body, I’ll vote Rick Perry. If I want my money given away to corporate friends, I’ll vote Rick Perry. And lastly if I want to try and listen to a moron tell me how to live my life while trying to stutter it out over several minutes, I’ll vote for...Obama. Oh wait, you might have thought I’d say Rick Perry (also a bumbling, paid for idiot), well they do have a lot in common. No thanks, to either of them.