But Cain also got heat for talking about an electrified fence and alligators in a moat. He is solid on this issue...and no, he isn’t anywhere close to being knocked from the top tier.
One last thing...to the Newters on here...we do understand the concepts Newt is preaching. We usually understand what he is saying. It seems to me that you are the ones who are blind to who your candidate really is.
He's better than Romney, and Romney is being protected. If we diss Newt, we're screwed. He's the only electable canidate still in the race.
Sure, Newts idea totally sucks, but he can't do it alone. He'll need the House and Senate to pull it off. We could stop it there.
In the meantime, we've got to keep Romney from moving to the top, because if he's there on primary day, the job is his.
The current controversy here is not about the fence. That’s a whole other thing.
We’re talking about the question of what to do about the 12m (or pick a number you like) illegals already here.
Gingrich has said...oh, you know what he said. You can find it anywhere. It’s transcribed on my homepage. I’m getting tired of repeating it. Tell me you read it and see amnesty.
Bachmann and Cain have both left open the possibility of “reasonable programs” after the first step of securing the border.
Gingrich is just offering more detail.
I asked someone else this, now I’ll ask you:
Do you think anyone in America, citizen or not, should be tried collectively rather than individually? Tried without any hearing of his individual situation or any mitigating circumstances?