Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: autumnraine
READ THE BILL:

SEC. 1032. REQUIREMENT FOR MILITARY CUSTODY.

(a) Custody Pending Disposition Under Law of War-

(1) IN GENERAL- Except as provided in paragraph (4), the Armed Forces of the United States shall hold a person described in paragraph (2) who is captured in the course of hostilities authorized by the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107-40) in military custody pending disposition under the law of war.

(2) COVERED PERSONS- The requirement in paragraph (1) shall apply to any person whose detention is authorized under section 1031 who is determined--

(A) to be a member of, or part of, al-Qaeda or an associated force that acts in coordination with or pursuant to the direction of al-Qaeda; and

(B) to have participated in the course of planning or carrying out an attack or attempted attack against the United States or its coalition partners.

... snip ...

(b) Applicability to United States Citizens and Lawful Resident Aliens-

(1) UNITED STATES CITIZENS- The requirement to detain a person in military custody under this section does not extend to citizens of the United States

(2) LAWFUL RESIDENT ALIENS- The requirement to detain a person in military custody under this section does not extend to a lawful resident alien of the United States on the basis of conduct taking place within the United States, except to the extent permitted by the Constitution of the United States.

The way I read this, American citizens and legal aliens are specifically exempted from the requirement to detain enemy combatants. So, can someone explain to me why there is cause for concern?

24 posted on 11/26/2011 8:07:09 AM PST by GenXFreedomFighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: GenXFreedomFighter

My instincts were correct - if the ACLU is against it it must have some redeeming qualities.


37 posted on 11/26/2011 9:32:01 AM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: GenXFreedomFighter
The way I read this, American citizens and legal aliens are specifically exempted from the requirement to detain enemy combatants. So, can someone explain to me why there is cause for concern?

1) Slippery slope incrementalism. No matter what kind of power you give the federal government, they *never* stay within the original defined limits
2) Consider the source. These people are *not* trustworthy.

40 posted on 11/26/2011 10:10:37 AM PST by ChildOfThe60s ( If you can remember the 60s....you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: GenXFreedomFighter

And it was voted on, and it is a 48 year old legislation that gets an appropriation every year with some amendments.


43 posted on 11/26/2011 10:14:56 AM PST by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: GenXFreedomFighter; LucyT

LucyT - GenX has quotes from the bill.

I would like to know the specifics and truth; really hard to know sometimes.


61 posted on 11/26/2011 4:14:44 PM PST by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson