Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp

“(I think we are seeing a replacement birth certificate which was created for an adopted child.)”

The one they posted couldn’t have been created pre-photo shop.


58 posted on 11/29/2011 8:28:07 AM PST by JohnnyP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: JohnnyP
The one they posted couldn’t have been created pre-photo shop.

This is true. They just used more modern tools to do what they have always been doing.

I am an adopted child, I have a birth certificate which was created 6 years after I was born. It was fabricated using pre-photoshop technology, and it contains the same Doctor's signature as did my original.

A lot of people simply do not understand that seeing a birth certificate that is not sworn to be an "original" is not actual proof of birth. It is only proof that a state legally recognizes an individual per the document.

59 posted on 11/29/2011 8:33:59 AM PST by DiogenesLamp (Partus sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson