Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp

“Also, why no comment on this? (Ex Parte Reynolds. Circuit court for Arkansas: 5 Dillon 394-404. 1879)

Obviously overruled by U.S. v Wong Kim Ark, if not before.


38 posted on 11/25/2011 9:58:59 PM PST by BladeBryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: BladeBryan
“Also, why no comment on this? (Ex Parte Reynolds. Circuit court for Arkansas: 5 Dillon 394-404. 1879)

Obviously overruled by U.S. v Wong Kim Ark, if not before.

You obviously didn't comprehend the ruling. The court ruled that Puryear WAS a U.S. Citizen. How would Wong Kim Ark overrule this? By declaring him NOT a Citizen? Perhaps this lawyering stuff is too complicated for you?

44 posted on 11/26/2011 10:36:12 AM PST by DiogenesLamp (Partus sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson