Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lady Lucky
given the fact that they’ve been law-abiding citizens for 25 years.

And there's the fatal flaw of Newt's "argument."

71 posted on 11/23/2011 8:23:27 AM PST by M. Thatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: M. Thatcher

I agree on this point, he should have said “otherwise law-abiding” or “like law-abiding citizens.”

Technically they are breaking the law every day they are here illegally. I don’t like hearing it glossed over, even if he does have but a 30-second window to speak.

However, many (e.g., many wives and children) may have had no practical alternative but to come here when commanded by the head of their household.

I think if welfare recipients can be reviewed for workfare fitness on a case-by-case basis, illegal residents can also. And it would probably be better if this were done by the state rather than the federal government; indeed the welfare/workfare requirements are applied on a county level in my state. But certainly it is feasible and the alternative of mass deportation is not.


76 posted on 11/23/2011 8:33:36 AM PST by Lady Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

To: M. Thatcher
A better word would have been "resident." I wouldn't dismiss the whole answer because he misspoke one word here.

-PJ

131 posted on 11/23/2011 9:33:08 AM PST by Political Junkie Too (If you can vote for President, then your children can run for President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson