Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins
It's not a question of culpability.

They do not belong here, and the reason they're birthed here is in order to anchor their parents-and their extended family-to the United States in perpetuity.

Hence, the term "anchor baby." This is why the open borders crowd tried to make Elvira Arellano into their poster-child, despite the fact that she had children AFTER being deported once from this country.

It's also why the DREAM Act is being used as the stalking horse for wholesale amnesty.

105 posted on 11/23/2011 1:55:18 PM PST by OddLane (If Lionel Hutz and Guy Smiley had a lovechild together, his name would be "Mitt Romney." -KAJ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]


To: OddLane

Since anchor babies are already a reality and part of our law....Governor Bobby Jindal is an anchor baby...there is no deporting of the parents of a US citizen baby that is going to take place.

That baby is considered a full-fledged, 100% American citizen by the law.

That is never going to change for that child.


107 posted on 11/23/2011 1:57:45 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True Supporters of our Troops PRAY for their VICTORY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson