- How do Cainiacs think Herman will fare under such scrutiny (especially after the last sit down with the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel)?
- Do Cain supporters get a queasy feeling thinking about this proposition. Are they a little nervous - hoping that he makes it through without another implosion?
- How about tonight's debate? It will highlight foreign policy. Will Cain get a question requiring a serious answer? How will he handle it? Will Cainiacs be watching in nervous anticipation while maintaining a sweaty palmed death grip on the remote?
Well if Cain wanted to call attention to himself..he’s more than succeeded..
another foreign policy debate tonight?
Who freaking CARES!
we have had exactly ONE debate that discussed social issues and Romney didn’t even come to it!
This whole debate thing is a freaking setup!
I'm confident Cain will learn from his mistakes. He'll make sure he's more prepped and better rested. He'll be fine.
- Do Cain supporters get a queasy feeling thinking about this proposition. Are they a little nervous - hoping that he makes it through without another implosion?
If he does, he does. Kudos to him for taking the risk.. a whole lot more than we'll see from the "media's" perennial "front-runner" Romney.
- How about tonight's debate? It will highlight foreign policy. Will Cain get a question requiring a serious answer?
If Cain has given adequate time to review subject matter of the readaheads the Heritage Foundation forwarded to each candidate, he'll do a good job.
How will he handle it?
If he's properly prepped, he'll do fine.
Will Cainiacs be watching in nervous anticipation while maintaining a sweaty palmed death grip on the remote?
Probably no more than the Perriwinkles will, anytime their candidate attempts a stammering enumeration of more than two items in a list.
My question to you is
Why is this interview so stinking important?
I think it was Rove last nite that basically declared Cain dead cause he canceled the gig. That’s BS!
Personally, I don’t expect my candidate to have all the answers on the tip of his/her tongue and I don’t expect flawless performances. In fact, I’m deeply suspicious of glib, sanctimonious, poll tested, and canned interviews.
Granted, the LSM will jump every conservative mis-step but so what’s new about that? How about just for a change we pick someone with real values and the willingness to stand their ground. The names Cain, Palin, Bachmann, Ryan, and Thompson come to mind. Why are we so willing to crucify the average joes(jolines) and tolerant of the career political frauds?
Since he didn’t show up for the previous interview, is this one free?
As far as the interview on Libya is concerned, at the end he gave the RIGHT ANSWER, the ONLY ANSWER as far as I'm concerned.
He said he would have handled everything differently than Obama and finished with the truth.
He said, THE PROBLEM IS WE STILL DON'T KNOW WHO ARE THE PEOPLE WE SUPPORTED.
None of the self appointed hot-shots got that, including "our" (meaning Fox) newspeople, all of "their" newspeople, Hillary Clinton, Obama, every disgusting Dem and some of our experts like Bolton (who used to be one of my favorites).
Why were these Titans calling the attacks (and also all the other attacks on formerly friendly M.E. states) "the Arab Spring" when we absolutely DID know that at least some of those wonderful "freedom seeking" revolutionaries were Muslim Brotherhood and al Qaeda itself!!!
Even if it was a good idea for Qadaffi to go, was it a good idea to replace him (and the others) with something totally evil and destructive and much, much worse than the "problem"? Couldn't it have waited at least until we knew if we were helping or hurting? Promoting our deadliest enemies?
Herman Cain was the only one I heard say what has now become an obvious truth, "We don't know who we're supporting". Even operating with only four hours sleep and even with his obvious hesitation, he still gave the only right answer.