To: An.American.Expatriate
we have similar rules in the states where you can’t just move to move. It has to be for a benefit to the person and by extension the child.
15 posted on
11/22/2011 10:14:01 AM PST by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: longtermmemmory
we have similar rules in the states where you can’t just move to move. It has to be for a benefit to the person and by extension the child. And that means it's okay? Just because the US has this rule, it's okay to infringe upon a persons rights? Does the word inalienable mean whenever government decides it's expedient?
If that is what passes for the "conservative" position, then the country is far worse off then I feared.
17 posted on
11/22/2011 10:18:33 AM PST by
An.American.Expatriate
(Here's my strategy on the War against Terrorism: We win, they lose. - with apologies to R.R.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson