Posted on 11/21/2011 9:27:10 PM PST by trumandogz
A teenager who fatally shot a gay classmate in the back of the head during an Oxnard middle school computer lab will spend 21 years in prison under a plea deal reached Monday, closing the books on a case that drew international headlines and ignited debate on how schools should handle sexual identity issues.
(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...
“You, as usual, are a nasty little burr who purposely ignores truth and reality and serves no purpose on FR other than to try to rile up conservatives by your aggressive and deceitful tactics.”
I believe the only stand I have taken is that the school shooter should go to prison for a very long time for the murder of a classmate.
Perhaps, it was just the way I was raised in that were I come where we are tough on crime and send murderers away for a very long time.
“However, sexual harassment should not result in homicide.”
It does though. Should we ignore why?
“It does though. Should we ignore why?”
No, we really cannot ignore murder.
Should we not punish a killer if he says he did it because his feelings were being hurt by the victim?
Mostly, people get what they get for what they do. That seems about right to me.
The irony, of course, is that he'll be fresh meat in prison, where the homosexual advances made on him won't be just flirtation.
I think a lot of homos would be dead in prison if victims of physical harassment had a gun. If you a teenage boy who can not get out from under a situation of sexual abuse at your pc prison-school, violence is perfectly fine in self defense, imo.
I would not find a boy guilty of killing an aggressive sexual perp. they could not get to stop otherwise. Too bad none of the boys were able to plug Sandusky. That would have been one way to stop him - the only way.
“No, we really cannot ignore murder.”
Nobody is ignoring the murder. Guy got 21 years for it.
Ignoring the steady degradation of our morals gets what it gets.
Agreed. That sums up what we’ve become pretty well.
“If you {sic} a teenage boy who can not get out from under a situation of sexual abuse at your pc prison-school, violence is perfectly fine in self defense, imo.”
Are teenage boys the only ones who should be able to get away with murder or should girls in school also be able to murder those who harass them or hit on them?
“I would not find a boy guilty...”
No need for you to find him not guilty on a jury as Brandon McInerney plead guilty to his crime.
However, if you like, you can tell tell Brandon of your belief in his innocence some time in late 2032.
Currently we are talking about boys being sexually dominated by homosexuals. You may equate homos and hertos sexually. I don’t. No in any way.
Should be “not in any way.”
“Currently we are talking about boys being sexually dominated by homosexuals. You may equate homos and hertos sexually. I don’t. No in any way.”
As for me, I would be equally as upset if a boy was harassing my daughter as I would be if a boy was harassing my son.
However, I would not advocate my son or daughter taking a gun to school and murdering the harasser.
“However, I would not advocate my son or daughter taking a gun to school and murdering the harasser.”
That’s a given. Would you advocate that your son or daughter accept homosexuality as normal and legitimate?
“Would you advocate that your son or daughter accept homosexuality as normal and legitimate?”
I would rather my kids “accept homosexuality as normal and legitimate” than have them doing 21 years in the slammer for killing someone.
“However, sexual harassment should not result in homicide.”
Why not? What better way to deal with sexual stalkers! The leftist aka progressive way of dealing with sexual stalkers is moronic. Requiring them to register as perverts. Then promising not to roam the streets stalking normal people. This kind of sexual harassment from perverted homosexuals. Is what has always go them beaten down. But now they feel they have a right to do this. And people cannot react!
You’ve yet to answer a question I’ve asked.
“You’ve yet to answer a question I’ve asked.”
Is that required?
What was the question?
And perhaps, you should be more patient, man.
“I would rather my kids “accept homosexuality as normal and legitimate” than have them doing 21 years in the slammer for killing someone.”
Will you use this same line for someone killing a child molester?
““I would rather my kids “accept homosexuality as normal and legitimate” than have them doing 21 years in the slammer for killing someone.””
“Will you use this same line for someone killing a child molester?”
Let’s see, Child Molestation is a violent First Degree Felony while being a homosexual is perfectly legal.
Therefore, I believe that a person does have the right to use force to protect themselves from a violent crime, but not to murder others simply because they are gay.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.