Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Please vote yes. Occupiers are holding the city hostage legally. Poll down on the right side, halfway down.
1 posted on 11/21/2011 5:15:05 PM PST by DeusExMachina05
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: DeusExMachina05; 2ndDivisionVet; A knight without armor; Alexander Rubin; all the best; ...
Camping in a public park is one of those constitutional thingies right?/s

FREEP THIS POLL ***PING!*** FRmail me if you want to be added or removed from the Fearless Poll-Freeping Freepers Ping list. And be sure to ping me to any polls that need Freepin', if I miss them. (looks like a medium volume list) (gordongekko909, founder of the pinglist, stays on the list until his ghost signs up for the list)

2 posted on 11/21/2011 5:19:09 PM PST by dynachrome ("Our forefathers didn't bury their guns. They buried those that tried to take them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DeusExMachina05; Grampa Dave; tubebender; hedgetrimmer; forester; calcowgirl; BOBTHENAILER
84% YES!!! The bastards should always be forced to get parade permits, demonstration permits, public displays of fetid behavior permits, etc., etc., etc...

At least all the permits and fees demanded of TeaParties across the exceptional American nation!!!

3 posted on 11/21/2011 5:21:10 PM PST by SierraWasp (I'm done being disappointed by "He/She is the only one who can win" and being embarrassed later!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DeusExMachina05

I voted yes per your request, but I don’t think they should be allowed to “camp” on city land, period.


4 posted on 11/21/2011 5:22:33 PM PST by Gator113 (~Just livin' life, my way~.. Newt/West 2012."got a lot swirling around in my head.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DeusExMachina05

Is there currently an ordinance against camping on city property? If so then yes they should get a permit. If no then let them stay and fight them with TRUTH. It might be harder but it is the right way to fight this. Law is crap and truth is truth.


5 posted on 11/21/2011 5:24:47 PM PST by pennyfarmer (Even a RINO will chew its foot off when caught in a trap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DeusExMachina05

Just stop it!

These OWS (Obama World Squatters) are violating the LOITERING laws of EVERY city that they “camp” in.

So just stop it by enforcing, (with pepper spray if necessary), the local loitering laws.


11 posted on 11/21/2011 5:46:34 PM PST by Graewoulf ( obama"care" violates the 1890 Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND is illegal by the U.S. Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DeusExMachina05

Yes 91.06%


12 posted on 11/21/2011 5:51:57 PM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DeusExMachina05

Yes 91.15% (175 votes)

No 8.85% (17 votes)

Total Votes: 192


14 posted on 11/21/2011 5:59:48 PM PST by Munz (All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DeusExMachina05

Wait a second. Aren’t they already required to do this? Whenever we had a Tea Party rally we had to get permits, make sure the area was left clean and there was no camping out and disrupting traffic.


15 posted on 11/21/2011 6:04:32 PM PST by YankeeReb (Even in front of 3rd graders, 0bama is still the least qualified person in the room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DeusExMachina05

Would anyone and everyone else be allowed to camp there? The article makes it sound like the city officials have no idea.


16 posted on 11/21/2011 6:05:57 PM PST by TigersEye (Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DeusExMachina05; dynachrome
Yes
91.6% (218 votes)

No
8.4% (20 votes)

Total Votes: 238
18 posted on 11/21/2011 6:13:46 PM PST by TheOldLady (FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DeusExMachina05

Yes 91.36% (328 votes)

No 8.64% (31 votes)

Total Votes: 359


20 posted on 11/21/2011 7:22:19 PM PST by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DeusExMachina05

Why did the Occupier cross the road?

•Because his Mom called and said, “It’s time to come home, honey.”
•Because ‘Ketchup’ broke her glasses during a fit of righteous crying and had to go to Lynz-Krafterz.
•Because some radicals thought “free love” meant “unsolicited surprise sex.”
•Because three homeless guys were occupying his tent “Help, police...”
•Because a few “more-equal-than-thous” (aka, Party people) appropriated [sic, smoked up] his stach for the Greater Good™ — he had to score another bag of kind bud
•Because the police car looked like a port-o-john


22 posted on 11/22/2011 7:27:35 AM PST by Neoliberalnot ((Read "The Grey Book" for an alternative to corruption in DC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson