Valid questions but I do believe true pedophiles are a separate category from homo or hetero sexuals who are attracted to adults.
The phenomenon of “liking them young” or the fact that some underage people can be quite developed has nothing to do with the true pedo. The pedophile is fixated on a particular age group and loses inerest as soon as the child is any more developed.
This is distinct from gays who hit on maybe 15 to 18 year olds.
That’s a good point. This bunch seems to like to hit them at that age when boys are still kind of tender young’uns. That period when the girls are bigger than they are. That just occurred to me the other day.
The majority of homosexuals have been molested/seduced when young, either as pre-pubescent children or young adolescents. That should give you a clue about homosexuality and pederasty.
Which was the case in most of the priest incidents. But the pro-homosexual press keep using the term pedophile, even when the victims was older than 15.
homosexual acts are just that. There is no moral acceptability card just because of age.
“This is distinct from gays who hit on maybe 15 to 18 year olds.”
Which, of course, is the situation at Penn State.